The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Amitoj Kaur Chawla <amitoj1606@gmail.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Coccinelle <cocci@systeme.lip6.fr>,
	Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr>,
	Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com>,
	Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag.fr>
Subject: Re: [Cocci] [PATCH v3] Coccinelle: Script to replace allocate and memset with zalloc functions
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 14:32:46 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1608011429090.3188@hadrien> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f5754bb5-24f6-3bcb-6f20-52f278fe8b70@users.sourceforge.net>



On Mon, 1 Aug 2016, SF Markus Elfring wrote:

> >> How do you think about the following SmPL script example?
> >>
> >> @vz_combined
> >>  depends on patch && !context && !org && !report@
> >> type T;
> >> T* pointer;
> >> +statement S;
> >> expression express;
> >> @@
> >>  pointer =
> >> -          vmalloc
> >> +          vzalloc
> >>            (...);
> >>  if (!d)
> >>     S
> >> -memset(d, 0, sizeof(
> >> (
> >> -T
> >> |
> >> -*(express)
> >> )
> >> -));

Actually, this is a mess.  pointer, d, and express are all supposed to be
the same thing, as they were in the original rule.

Furthermore, this shows a reason why the original rule was better.  If you
say T *pointer, then you require that Coccinelle can find the type
sofficiently to know that it is a pointer.  There was no such constraint
in the sizeof(*d) variant of the original rule.

> > The performance issue is that disjunctions on expressions, eg (A | B), are
> > implemented as (A | (!A & B)), ie with a negation of all the previous
> > options &d with each option.  So it is better to avoid very large
> > disjunctions on expressions.
>
> Is the suggested SmPL disjunction still small enough for this concern?

2 elements is OK.

julia

  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-01 12:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-01  7:02 [PATCH v3] Coccinelle: Script to replace allocate and memset with zalloc functions Amitoj Kaur Chawla
2016-08-01 11:23 ` [Cocci] " SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-01 11:37   ` Julia Lawall
2016-08-01 11:56     ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-01 12:03       ` Julia Lawall
2016-08-01 12:24         ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-01 12:32           ` Julia Lawall [this message]
2016-08-01 12:45             ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-19 12:14   ` Amitoj Kaur Chawla
2016-08-19 12:41     ` Julia Lawall
2016-08-19 13:26     ` [Cocci] " SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-19 13:30       ` Julia Lawall
2016-08-19 16:56         ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-03-03 10:34 ` [Cocci] [PATCH v3] " SF Markus Elfring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.10.1608011429090.3188@hadrien \
    --to=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
    --cc=Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr \
    --cc=amitoj1606@gmail.com \
    --cc=cocci@systeme.lip6.fr \
    --cc=elfring@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mmarek@suse.com \
    --cc=nicolas.palix@imag.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox