linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Scot Doyle <lkml14@scotdoyle.com>
To: "Peter Hüwe" <PeterHuewe@gmx.de>
Cc: Ashley Lai <ashley@ashleylai.com>,
	Marcel Selhorst <tpmdd@selhorst.net>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>,
	Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>,
	tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v8] tpm_tis: verify interrupt during init
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 20:08:07 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1410192003420.1938@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201409222101.19297.PeterHuewe@gmx.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 764 bytes --]

On Mon, 22 Sep 2014, Peter Hüwe wrote:

> Am Montag, 22. September 2014, 19:13:38 schrieb Jason Gunthorpe:
> 
> > 
> > This does look much nicer, lets use this version.
> > 
> > I think Peter were prefer a new clean patch that superceeds the
> > original.
> > 
> > > +	if (!priv->irq_tested) {
> > 
> > I think the sleep and check is still needed here, the IRQ delivery
> > could race relative to the MMIO read of completion, a sleep is the
> > only way we could attempt to synchronize them..
> > 
> 
> So will there be a v9?
> 
> Merge Window is coming up shortly, so I would like to have this sorted out 
> soon ;)
> 
> Thanks,
> Peter

Hi Peter,

The v10 patch was reviewed by Jason and is ready to go. Will you be asking 
James to pull this week?

Thanks,
Scot

  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-19 20:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-22  0:58 [PATCH] tpm_tis: Verify ACPI-specified interrupt Scot Doyle
2014-08-22 16:06 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-08-22 20:17   ` Scot Doyle
2014-08-22 20:32     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-08-22 22:48       ` Peter Hüwe
2014-08-25  6:38       ` Scot Doyle
2014-08-25 18:24         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-08-27  4:31           ` [RFC PATCH v2] tpm_tis: verify interrupt during init Scot Doyle
2014-08-27 17:31             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-08-27 21:32               ` [RFC PATCH v3] " Scot Doyle
2014-08-27 21:47                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-08-28  0:35                   ` Scot Doyle
2014-08-28 16:53                     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-08-29 23:59                       ` [RFC PATCH v4] " Scot Doyle
2014-08-30 17:49                         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-08-30 23:23                           ` [RFC PATCH v5] " Scot Doyle
2014-09-02 17:20                             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-09-02 20:22                               ` [RFC PATCH v6] " Scot Doyle
2014-09-08 22:02                                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-09-09  2:13                                   ` [PATCH v7] " Scot Doyle
2014-09-09  3:12                                     ` Scot Doyle
2014-09-11  0:50                                   ` [RFC PATCH v8] " Scot Doyle
2014-09-16 23:36                                     ` Scot Doyle
2014-09-22 17:13                                     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-09-22 19:01                                       ` Peter Hüwe
2014-10-19 20:08                                         ` Scot Doyle [this message]
2014-09-23  2:44                                       ` Scot Doyle
2014-09-23  2:51                                         ` [PATCH v9] " Scot Doyle
2014-09-23 11:55                                           ` Scot Doyle
2014-09-23 17:12                                             ` [tpmdd-devel] " Stefan Berger
2014-09-24 19:38                                               ` Scot Doyle
2014-09-24 19:41                                                 ` Stefan Berger
2014-09-24 22:41                                                   ` [PATCH v10] " Scot Doyle
2014-09-29 17:24                                                     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-11-30 14:24                                                       ` Peter Hüwe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.11.1410192003420.1938@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=lkml14@scotdoyle.com \
    --cc=PeterHuewe@gmx.de \
    --cc=ashley@ashleylai.com \
    --cc=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=semenzato@google.com \
    --cc=stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=tpmdd@selhorst.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).