The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] mfd: arizona: Fix lockdep recursion warning on set_irq_wake
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 13:56:52 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1603241355110.3978@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160324124438.GA8538@x1>

On Thu, 24 Mar 2016, Lee Jones wrote:

> FAO Thomas
> 
> > Lockdep explicitly sets all the irq_desc locks as a single lock-class,
> > which causes a "possible recursive locking detected" warning when we
> > attempt to propagate the IRQ wake to our parent IRQ in
> > arizona_irq_set_wake. Although this appears to be a false positive
> > because an IRQ is unlikely to be its own parent, this was clearly
> > intentionally prohibited.
> > 
> > To avoid this lockdep warning, take a cue from the regmap-irq system,
> > and add bus lock callbacks on the IRQ chip and propagate the wake in
> > the bus unlock which will happen after the desc lock has been released
> > and thus avoid the issue.
> 
> This looks like a hack to me.  I'd like Thomas (Cc'ed) to look it over.

irq_set_lockdep_class() exists for a reason. See kernel/irq/generic-chip.c or
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c for examples.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-24 12:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-10 10:16 [PATCH RESEND] mfd: arizona: Fix lockdep recursion warning on set_irq_wake Charles Keepax
     [not found] ` <20160324123618.GB3496@x1>
2016-03-24 12:44   ` Lee Jones
2016-03-24 12:56     ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2016-03-24 15:35       ` Charles Keepax

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.11.1603241355110.3978@nanos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox