The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Cc: devel@linuxdriverproject.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
	Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	Alex Ng <alexng@microsoft.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] hv_util: adjust system time smoothly
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 22:27:44 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1701092129590.3534@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170104172439.19683-1-vkuznets@redhat.com>

On Wed, 4 Jan 2017, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:

> Changes since v1:
> - do do_settimeofday64() when ICTIMESYNCFLAG_SYNC flag is present in the
>   request (Alex Ng)
> - add pr_debug() for the case when do_adjtimex() fails (Alex Ng)
> 
> Original description:
> 
> With TimeSync version 4 protocol support we started updating system time
> continuously through the whole lifetime of Hyper-V guests. Every 5 seconds
> there is a time sample from the host which triggers do_settimeofday[64]().
> While the time from the host is very accurate such adjustments may cause
> issues:
> - Time is jumping forward and backward, some applications may misbehave.
> - In case an NTP client is run in parallel things may go south, e.g. when
>   an NTP client tries to adjust tick/frequency with ADJ_TICK/ADJ_FREQUENCY
>   the Hyper-V module will not see this changes and time will oscillate and
>   never converge.
> - Systemd starts annoying you by printing "Time has been changed" every 5
>   seconds to the system log.
> 
> With this series I suggest to use do_adjtimex() to adjust time. My tests
> show that such method gives equally good time convergence but avoids all
> the drawbacks described above.

To be honest, I think all of this is just tinkering.

1) do_adjtimex() is assuming that there is a single client connected which
   is responsible for the updates. So I seriously doubt that a NTP client
   running in the guest will cooperate nicely with that timesync magic
   under all circumstances.

2) There is still the possibility to force do_settimeofday() calls which
   will upset NTP clients and have other side effects.

   Why is this call necessary at all? Just because it's in some spec?

3) What happens if you have a PTP capable network card mapped into your
   guest and the guest uses PTP for time synchronization? The outcome is
   predictible: CRAP.

I can see the value for a host wide time synchronization, but please use
mechanisms which do not interfere with the rest of the time eco system in
Linux.

The timesync thing happens periodically every 5 seconds, which you can feed
nicely into the PPS subsystem and then the guest side NTP daemon can
utilize it (or not).

Thanks,

	tglx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-01-09 21:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-04 17:24 [PATCH v2 0/4] hv_util: adjust system time smoothly Vitaly Kuznetsov
2017-01-04 17:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] timekeeping: export do_adjtimex() to modules Vitaly Kuznetsov
2017-01-07  1:06   ` John Stultz
2017-01-09 13:03     ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2017-01-04 17:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] hv_util: switch to using timespec64 Vitaly Kuznetsov
2017-01-07  1:04   ` John Stultz
2017-01-04 17:24 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] hv_util: use do_adjtimex() to update system time Vitaly Kuznetsov
2017-01-04 19:09   ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-01-05 12:37     ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2017-01-07  0:56   ` John Stultz
2017-01-04 17:24 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] hv_util: improve time adjustment accuracy by disabling interrupts Vitaly Kuznetsov
2017-01-04 19:17   ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-01-05 12:35     ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2017-01-05 17:39       ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-01-07  1:02   ` John Stultz
2017-01-09 13:05     ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2017-01-09 21:27 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2017-01-10 14:30   ` [PATCH v2 0/4] hv_util: adjust system time smoothly Vitaly Kuznetsov
2017-01-10 14:58     ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-01-13 13:05       ` [PATCH RFC] hv_utils: implement Hyper-V PTP source Vitaly Kuznetsov
2017-01-13 14:50         ` Richard Cochran
2017-01-13 15:38           ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2017-01-13 15:21         ` Olaf Hering
2017-01-13 15:37           ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2017-01-16 19:29         ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-01-17  9:53           ` Vitaly Kuznetsov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1701092129590.3534@nanos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=alexng@microsoft.com \
    --cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
    --cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=kys@microsoft.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox