From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751927AbdFTOGl (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jun 2017 10:06:41 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:44108 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751025AbdFTOGj (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jun 2017 10:06:39 -0400 Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 16:05:07 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Daniel Lezcano cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, peterz@infradead.org, rafael@kernel.org, nicolas.pitre@linaro.org, Mark Rutland , Vineet Gupta , Marc Zyngier , Patrice Chotard , Kukjin Kim , Javier Martinez Canillas , Christoffer Dall , Paolo Bonzini , =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Radim_Kr=E8m=E1=F8?= , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Russell King , Richard Cochran , Ray Jui , Christoph Hellwig , Jens Axboe , Hannes Reinecke , "moderated list:ARM PORT" , "open list:SYNOPSYS ARC ARCH..." , "moderated list:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNO..." Subject: Re: [PATCH V10 1/3] irq: Allow to pass the IRQF_TIMER flag with percpu irq request In-Reply-To: <1497275529-23565-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Message-ID: References: <20170612135108.GD2261@mai> <1497275529-23565-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 12 Jun 2017, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > But, the API request_percpu_irq does not allow to pass a flag, hence specifying > if the interrupt type is a timer. > > Add a function request_percpu_irq_flags() where we can specify the flags. The > request_percpu_irq() function is changed to be a wrapper to > request_percpu_irq_flags() passing a zero flag parameter. And exactly this change wants to be a separate patch. We do not make whole sale changes this way. You should know that already and someone pointed that out to you in some of the earlier versions. > -int request_percpu_irq(unsigned int irq, irq_handler_t handler, > - const char *devname, void __percpu *dev_id) > +int request_percpu_irq_flags(unsigned int irq, irq_handler_t handler, The function name sucks. The first time I read it, it meant request the per cpu irq flags, which is not what you aim at, right? Please make that __request_percpu_irq() for now and on -rc1 time provide a patch set to convert all current request_percpu_irq() users to have the extra argument and then remove the __request_percpu_irq() intermediate. Thanks, tglx