From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Piotr Luc <piotr.luc@intel.com>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
He Chen <he.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Cache logical pkg id in uncore driver
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 23:19:55 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1711072315100.4871@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171105165428.32108-2-prarit@redhat.com>
On Sun, 5 Nov 2017, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
> index d45e06346f14..87ef77982248 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
> @@ -947,6 +947,7 @@ static int uncore_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id
>
> atomic_inc(&box->refcnt);
> box->pci_phys_id = phys_id;
> + box->logical_pkg_id = topology_phys_to_logical_pkg(box->pci_phys_id);
So in that same function topology_phys_to_logical_pkg() has been called
already and the result is in the local variable 'pkg' which gets assigned
in the very next line.....
> box->pkgid = pkg;
> box->pci_dev = pdev;
> box->pmu = pmu;
uncore_pci_remove() does not use the cached data either. Can we please make
that consistent?
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-07 22:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-05 16:54 [PATCH v5 0/3] Fix panic in logical packages calculation Prarit Bhargava
2017-11-05 16:54 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Cache logical pkg id in uncore driver Prarit Bhargava
2017-11-07 22:19 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2017-11-05 16:54 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] x86/topology: Avoid wasting 128k for package id array Prarit Bhargava
2017-11-10 0:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-10 12:29 ` Prarit Bhargava
2017-11-10 12:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-10 12:56 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-10 15:01 ` Andi Kleen
2017-11-10 18:35 ` Prarit Bhargava
2017-11-10 19:39 ` Andi Kleen
2017-11-12 13:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-12 16:55 ` Prarit Bhargava
2017-11-10 2:42 ` [lkp-robot] [x86/topology] 4b5ebf8be9: BUG:KASAN:slab-out-of-bounds kernel test robot
2017-11-05 16:54 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] x86/smpboot: Fix __max_logical_packages estimate Prarit Bhargava
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1711072315100.4871@nanos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=he.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=minipli@googlemail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=piotr.luc@intel.com \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox