From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751727AbdK1HtS (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Nov 2017 02:49:18 -0500 Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.104]:26321 "EHLO mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751133AbdK1HtQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Nov 2017 02:49:16 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.44,467,1505772000"; d="scan'208";a="246298759" Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 08:49:13 +0100 (CET) From: Julia Lawall X-X-Sender: jll@hadrien To: SF Markus Elfring cc: Joe Perches , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, "Andrew F. Davis" , Arvind Yadav , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Tomi Valkeinen , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: omapfb/dss: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in three functions In-Reply-To: <7e7e64cf-dbe5-614a-f1e5-29d7b6cf9297@users.sourceforge.net> Message-ID: References: <1511809633.32426.70.camel@perches.com> <1511833514.32426.86.camel@perches.com> <7e7e64cf-dbe5-614a-f1e5-29d7b6cf9297@users.sourceforge.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > >> It seems that I got no responses so far for clarification requests > >> according to the documentation in a direction I hoped for. > > > > That's because you are pretty unresponsive to direction. > > From which places did you get this impression? Perhaps from the text that you have written only four lines below. All comments are dismissed as "the usual mixture of disagreements and acceptance". If you look at the patches sent by others, who learn from the feedback provided to them, there are not so many responses on the disagreements side. So the mixture is not usual. Since you send lots of patches on the same issues, there should be no disagreements at all at this point. julia > > > You've gotten _many_ replies to your patches > > I got the usual mixture of disagreements and acceptance for > my selection of change possibilities. > Some constructive feedback was also provided which might need > further software development considerations. > Is the situation improvable here? > > > > to which you have seemingly decided to ignore. > > You might eventually notice that I react to special information > occasionally with a big delay. > > For which concrete details are you still waiting for a better > response from me? > > Regards, > Markus > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >