From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE814C4363D for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 14:32:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D56F2311A for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 14:32:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728281AbgIXOcd (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Sep 2020 10:32:33 -0400 Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.104]:60645 "EHLO mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728088AbgIXOcd (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Sep 2020 10:32:33 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,298,1596492000"; d="scan'208";a="359963308" Received: from abo-173-121-68.mrs.modulonet.fr (HELO hadrien) ([85.68.121.173]) by mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Sep 2020 16:32:30 +0200 Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 16:32:30 +0200 (CEST) From: Julia Lawall X-X-Sender: jll@hadrien To: Markus Elfring cc: Sumera Priyadarsini , Coccinelle , Michal Marek , Gilles Muller , Nicolas Palix , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Cocci] [PATCH] coccinelle: iterators: Add for_each_child.cocci script In-Reply-To: <67ad40bd-c0c0-8c5c-54b2-c750cfeefd44@web.de> Message-ID: References: <67ad40bd-c0c0-8c5c-54b2-c750cfeefd44@web.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (DEB 394 2020-01-19) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 24 Sep 2020, Markus Elfring wrote: > > +@ruletwo depends on patch && !context && !org && !report@ > > How do you think about to combine code from two SmPL rules > by using another SmPL disjunction like the following? What is the goal of doing this? It seems substantially harder to understand than three rules that each take care of a specific case. julia > > @addition_rule depends on patch && !context && !org && !report@ > local idexpression r.n; > expression e,e1; > expression list [r.n1] es; > iterator r.i,i1,i2; > statement S,S2; > @@ > ( > i(es,n,...) { > ... > (of_node_put(n); > |e = n > |return n; > |i1(...,n,...) S > | > +of_node_put(n); > ?return ...; > ) > ... when any > } > | > i(es,n,...) { > ... > (of_node_put(n); > |e = n > |i1(...,n,...) S > | > +of_node_put(n); > ?break; > ) > ... when any > } > ... when != n > when strict > (n = e1; > | > ?i2(...,n,...) S2 > ) > ) > > > Regards, > Markus > _______________________________________________ > Cocci mailing list > Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr > https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci >