From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Cc: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
avuton@gmail.com, yakui.zhao@intel.com, shaohua.li@intel.com,
trenn@suse.de,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Subject: Re: a7839e96 (PNP: increase max resources) breaks my ALSA intel8x0 sound card
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 13:16:52 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.00.0802041300170.3034@hp.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200802041341.37313.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
> I'm sure you're right, but I don't understand why yet. Here's what
> I think is happening; please correct me where I'm going wrong:
>
> 1) enumerate PNP & ACPI devices
> 2) initialize PNP & ACPI drivers
> 2a) register ACPI PCI root bridge driver, which enumerates PCI
> devices behind the bridge
> 2b) register PNP system driver and reserve resources (this is
> where the current quirk skips some reservations)
> 3) initialize PCI drivers
> 3a) register intel8x0 sound driver and reserve conflicting
> resources
So where in this would you put the
pcibios_init() -> pcibios_resource_survey()
call (it's a subsys_initcall)?
THAT is the thing that actually registers the PCI resurces we've found
into the resource tree!
It's very inconveniently placed as-is, since it literally depends on the
whole initcall ordering (and the link order within that subsys_initcall
thing), and all of this is architecture-driven rather than driven from
some central place.
So this is the thing that I think should happen before any PnP or ACPI
drivers actually start registerign themselves (but obviously needs to
happen after the PCI buses have been enumerated).
The ACPI/PnP tables shouldn't be able to break the enumeration of the
actual hardware devices, now should it?
> I think you're suggesting that we should do 2a first, to enumerate all
> PCI devices, and only later do 2b. But I don't know how to accomplish
> that cleanly.
We should enumerate the PCI devices, then register their resources (and
no, I'm not at *all* convinced it should happen as a separate
subsys_initcall), and then register the PnP resources.
So I think we should have roughly something like:
- arch_initcall: this could enumerate the ACPI/PnP devices (but not
register anything). Alternatively, do it as subsys_initcall, and just
make sure it happens early with link-order.
- subsys_initcall: this should do that pcibios_init() thing that surveys
the resources (and the PCI enumeration needs to have happened before,
probably in the same initcall thanks to link order)
- PnP/ACPI resource allocation *after* it, but before driver loading
(which wll cause new resources to be allocated). This could be
fs_initcall, or whatever (that's what things like "acpi_event_init"
already do).
- regular drivers will come along much later, as part of
driver_initcall, and by the time this happens, we've now reserved all
resources we know about.
Basically, we just want to register the most trust-worthy resources before
we register anything less trust-worthy. And actual device probing simply
tends to be more trust-worthy than any randomly broken ACPI/PnP tables.
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-04 21:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <fa.Kmpf0B4W44W1VefIME7+BnfUouY@ifi.uio.no>
2008-01-27 18:17 ` a7839e96 (PNP: increase max resources) breaks my ALSA intel8x0 sound card Robert Hancock
2008-01-31 22:58 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-01 0:14 ` Robert Hancock
2008-02-01 0:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-02-04 17:39 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2008-02-04 18:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-02-04 20:41 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2008-02-04 21:16 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2008-02-05 7:03 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2008-02-05 16:46 ` Avuton Olrich
2008-02-05 18:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-02-05 20:12 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2008-02-13 22:33 ` Avuton Olrich
2008-02-14 18:51 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2008-02-14 19:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-02-14 20:07 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2008-02-14 20:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-02-14 21:01 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2008-02-14 21:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-02-14 22:28 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2008-02-14 22:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-02-14 23:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-02-15 0:13 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2008-02-15 0:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-02-27 17:43 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2008-01-27 14:40 Avuton Olrich
2008-01-27 21:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-01-28 1:15 ` Shaohua Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.1.00.0802041300170.3034@hp.linux-foundation.org \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=avuton@gmail.com \
--cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--cc=hancockr@shaw.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=trenn@suse.de \
--cc=yakui.zhao@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox