From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, andi@firstfloor.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
stable@kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [patch] x64, fpu: fix possible FPU leakage in error conditions
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:31:42 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0807241122260.3237@nehalem.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080724180429.GI14380@linux-os.sc.intel.com>
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008, Suresh Siddha wrote:
>
> In the error condition for restore_fpu_checking() (especially during
> the 64bit signal return), we are doing init_fpu(), which saves the live
> FPU register state (possibly belonging to some other process context) into the
> thread struct (through unlazy_fpu() in init_fpu()). This is wrong and can leak
> the FPU data.
>
> Remove the unlazy_fpu() from the init_fpu(). init_fpu() will now always
> init the FPU data in the thread struct. For the error conditions in
> restore_fpu_checking(), restore the initialized FPU data from the thread
> struct.
Why? The thread struct is guaranteed to contain pointless data.
If we cannot restore the FP state from the signal stack, we should not try
to restore it from anywhere _else_ either, since nowhere else will have
any better results.
I suspect we should just reset the x87 state (which was the _intention_ of
the code), possibly by just doing "stts + used_math = 0". The signal
handling code already checks for errors, and will force a SIGSEGV if this
ever happens.
(Yes, there is also a restore_fpu_checking() in math_state_restore(), but
that one _already_ uses ¤t->thread.xstate->fxsave as the buffer to
restore from, so trying to do that _again_ when it fails seems to be
really really wrong - we already _did_ that, and that was what failed to
begin with)
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-24 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-24 18:04 [patch] x64, fpu: fix possible FPU leakage in error conditions Suresh Siddha
2008-07-24 18:31 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2008-07-24 18:50 ` Suresh Siddha
2008-07-24 18:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-24 20:27 ` Suresh Siddha
2008-07-24 20:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-24 21:23 ` Suresh Siddha
2008-07-24 21:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-24 22:25 ` Suresh Siddha
2008-07-24 22:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-24 23:02 ` Suresh Siddha
2008-07-24 23:06 ` Suresh Siddha
2008-07-24 23:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-25 1:07 ` Suresh Siddha
2008-07-26 14:37 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.1.10.0807241122260.3237@nehalem.linux-foundation.org \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox