From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@krystal.dyndns.org>
Cc: Martin Bligh <mbligh@google.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com, "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>,
David Wilder <dwilder@us.ibm.com>,
hch@lst.de, Tom Zanussi <zanussi@comcast.net>,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] Unified trace buffer
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 09:49:39 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0809250941490.3265@nehalem.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080925163722.GA29392@Krystal>
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>
> I remembered other concerns about 27 vs 32 bits TSC decision, which are
> rather important. First, if we have a 27 bits TSC, with overflow every
> 33ms at 4GHz, we assume the kernel will _never_ have an interrupt
> latency longer than this for correct heartbeat behavior.
We do no such thing.
Guys, the heartbeat is a _separate_ thing from overflow handling.
You don't handle overflow by having a heartbeat that beats fifty times a
second just to insert events, just so that the TSC delta would always fit
in 27 bits. That would work, but be stupid. It would mean that you fill up
your event buffer with uninteresting crud just because nothing happens.
Yes, many people want to have a heartbeat (a "Mark" event) every once in a
while, but what I suggest is independent of heartbeats, even if it _could_
be implemented that way. What I suggest is simply that when you insert an
event, you always read the full 64 bits of TSC (on x86 - others will do
other things), and then you insert the delta against the last one.
After all, you cannot read just 27 bits of the TSC anyway. You _have_ to
read the whole 64 bits, and then you subtract the pervious trace event TSC
(that you have in the per-CPU trace buffer header) from that. You now have
a delta value.
And if the delta doesn't fit in 27 bits, you generate a 59-bit TSC event!
None of this has _anything_ to do with interrupt latency. There is no
dependency on a heartbeat, or any dependency on always inserting a trace
event at least 30 times a second. There's no worry about conversions, and
these are all trivial single assembly instructions to do (or a couple, on
a 32-bit architecture that needs to do a sub/sbb pair and test two
different registers to see if the result fits in 27 bits).
The only issue is that if you insert trace events more seldom, you'll
always get the extra TSC event as well, inserted automatically in front of
the event you explicitly inserted. The tracer doesn't need to know.
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-25 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 109+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-24 5:10 [RFC PATCH 0/3] An Unified tracing buffer (attempt) Steven Rostedt
2008-09-24 5:10 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] Unified trace buffer Steven Rostedt
2008-09-24 15:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-09-24 15:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-25 10:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-24 15:47 ` Martin Bligh
2008-09-24 16:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-09-24 16:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-24 16:37 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-24 16:56 ` Martin Bligh
2008-09-24 17:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-24 18:01 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-09-24 20:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-24 16:26 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-24 16:49 ` Martin Bligh
2008-09-24 17:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-24 17:49 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-24 20:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-24 20:37 ` David Miller
2008-09-24 20:48 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-24 20:51 ` Martin Bligh
2008-09-24 21:24 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-09-24 21:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-24 20:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-24 21:03 ` Martin Bligh
2008-09-24 21:17 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-24 21:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-25 10:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-09-25 14:33 ` Martin Bligh
2008-09-25 14:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-09-25 15:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-25 15:25 ` Martin Bligh
2008-09-25 15:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-25 16:23 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-09-25 16:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-25 17:20 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-09-25 17:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-25 16:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-25 16:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-25 17:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-25 19:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-25 20:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-25 20:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-25 20:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-25 20:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-25 21:01 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-25 21:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-25 21:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-25 21:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-25 21:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-25 21:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-25 22:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-25 23:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-27 17:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-27 17:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-27 17:38 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-27 17:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-09-27 18:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-27 18:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-25 20:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-25 21:14 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-25 21:15 ` Martin Bligh
2008-09-25 20:29 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-09-25 20:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-25 21:02 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-25 21:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-25 22:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-25 22:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-25 23:04 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-25 23:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-26 14:04 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-25 22:39 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-25 22:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-26 1:17 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-26 1:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-26 1:49 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-25 22:59 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-26 1:27 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-26 1:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-26 2:07 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-26 2:25 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-26 5:31 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-26 10:41 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-25 15:26 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-25 17:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-25 17:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-25 18:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-25 15:20 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-24 17:54 ` Martin Bligh
2008-09-24 18:04 ` Martin Bligh
2008-09-24 20:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-24 20:56 ` Martin Bligh
2008-09-24 21:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-24 20:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-24 20:53 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-09-24 22:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-24 22:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-25 17:15 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-09-25 17:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-25 17:42 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-09-25 16:37 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-09-25 16:49 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2008-09-25 17:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-24 16:13 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-09-24 16:31 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-24 16:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-09-24 16:51 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-09-24 5:10 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] ftrace: combine some print formating Steven Rostedt
2008-09-24 5:10 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] ftrace: hack in the ring buffer Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.1.10.0809250941490.3265@nehalem.linux-foundation.org \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=compudj@krystal.dyndns.org \
--cc=dwilder@us.ibm.com \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@google.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=zanussi@comcast.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox