From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
npiggin@suse.de, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
jens.axboe@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] use per cpu data for single cpu ipi calls
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:39:42 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0901291030510.3123@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1233253380.4495.123.camel@laptop>
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> Calls with wait=1 are deadlockable when done from within irqs or irq
> disabled sections because two cpus could cross ipi each other and stay
> waiting.
Sure. But this isn't the "wait=1" case. In the waiting case, we don't need
to allocate anything at all, we can just use the stack.
So the only case that matters for interrupts is indeed "wait=0", but
that's very much also the case we're talking about.
> That leaves us with the !wait case, which wasn't safe because that
> kmalloc could fail, and the fallback was wait, which yields the same
> deadlock.
Yes. I agree that the _concept_ of the patch is good. No argument there.
I'm just worried about the details.
> That leaves us with 6 cases,
>
> root@laptop:/usr/src/linux-2.6# git grep "smp_call_function_single(.*0)"
This misses a _lot_ of cases. What about this one:
kernel/relay.c: err = smp_call_function_single(i,
where you're not seeing if it's a non-waiting one or not (it's a waiting
one, but my point is that your grep is missing cases).
Doing
git grep -w smp_call_function_single | grep -v '1);'
is probably more likely to find the cases to look for.
But you're right, I'm still not seeing anything that looks _likely_ to be
a problem. But I worry that it's something somebody may want to do.
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-29 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-28 16:38 Buggy IPI and MTRR code on low memory Steven Rostedt
2009-01-28 16:41 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-28 16:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-28 16:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-28 17:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-28 17:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-28 18:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-28 18:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-28 18:22 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-01-28 18:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-28 21:12 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-28 21:13 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-28 21:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-28 22:07 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-28 22:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-28 23:20 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-28 23:50 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-28 23:25 ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-28 23:41 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-29 0:52 ` [PATCH] use per cpu data for single cpu ipi calls Steven Rostedt
2009-01-29 1:30 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-29 1:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-29 8:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-29 11:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-29 11:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-29 13:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-29 14:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-29 15:08 ` [PATCH -v2] " Steven Rostedt
2009-01-29 15:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-29 16:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-29 17:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-29 17:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-29 17:50 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-29 18:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-29 18:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-29 18:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-29 18:31 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-29 18:39 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2009-01-29 18:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-30 11:23 ` Jens Axboe
2009-01-30 12:32 ` [PATCH -v3] " Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-30 12:38 ` Jens Axboe
2009-01-30 12:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-30 12:55 ` Jens Axboe
2009-01-30 12:56 ` Jens Axboe
2009-01-30 13:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-30 13:02 ` [PATCH -v4] " Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-30 14:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-30 16:04 ` [PATCH -v3] " Linus Torvalds
2009-01-30 16:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-31 8:44 ` Jens Axboe
2009-01-29 18:49 ` [PATCH -v2] " Ingo Molnar
2009-01-30 1:55 ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-29 17:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-29 17:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-29 18:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-30 1:11 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.0901291030510.3123@localhost.localdomain \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox