public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ptrace: checkpatch fixes
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 13:44:23 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0904081341090.4583@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200904082157.54134.borntraeger@de.ibm.com>



On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> 
> Isnt checkpatch just following what is written down in the Documentation 
> folder? Maybe adopting the following part of CodingStyle and add more 
> examples for good and bad would give the checkpatch authors a better 
> idea about your intent.

The thing is, it's true that it's good if things fit in 80 columns.

But _splitting_ lines isn't the answer. Making code simpler is, but 
somehow the 80-column warning never causes that to happen - instead people 
just split.

And yes, I guess we should remove the language saying so. It's not from 
my original coding stule, it was added later by others, and came through 
Andrew (commit 560362dafe4de60db70f2c298a53f4613453a78b: "[PATCH] 
Codingstyle update" in the historical Linux archive).

			Linus

  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-08 20:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-08  6:21 [PATCH] ptrace: checkpatch fixes Roland McGrath
2009-04-08  7:26 ` Sergio Luis
2009-04-08 12:50   ` Roland McGrath
2009-04-08 20:49     ` Sergio Luis
2009-04-08 17:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-08 19:57   ` Christian Borntraeger
2009-04-08 20:44     ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2009-04-09  3:04   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-09  8:46     ` Miles Bader
2009-04-09 15:00     ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.0904081341090.4583@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=roland@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox