The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: [PATCH] Introduce a boolean "single_bit_set" function.
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:43:34 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0904231339080.13089@localhost.localdomain> (raw)


A boolean single_bit_set() routine would simplify the numerous
constructs of the form (((n & (n - 1)) == 0)) when testing for
single-bitness.

Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>

---

This is similar to the current is_power_of_2() routine defined in
include/linux/log2.h, which is mathematically identical but,
semantically, should be defined independently just so the code is more
readable.

I'm open to an alternative function name.

diff --git a/include/linux/bitops.h b/include/linux/bitops.h
index 6182913..1c0c840 100644
--- a/include/linux/bitops.h
+++ b/include/linux/bitops.h
@@ -45,6 +45,13 @@ static inline unsigned long hweight_long(unsigned long w)
 	return sizeof(w) == 4 ? hweight32(w) : hweight64(w);
 }

+static inline __attribute__((const))
+bool single_bit_set(unsigned long n)
+{
+        return (n != 0 && ((n & (n - 1)) == 0));
+}
+
+
 /**
  * rol32 - rotate a 32-bit value left
  * @word: value to rotate


========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                               Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

        Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry.

Web page:                                          http://crashcourse.ca
Linked In:                             http://www.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
========================================================================

             reply	other threads:[~2009-04-23 17:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-23 17:43 Robert P. J. Day [this message]
2009-04-23 19:57 ` [PATCH] Introduce a boolean "single_bit_set" function David Daney
2009-04-23 20:11   ` Robert P. J. Day
2009-04-23 23:57   ` Andrew Morton
2009-04-24 10:40     ` Robert P. J. Day
2009-04-24 17:46       ` Andrew Morton
2009-04-25 22:09         ` Robert P. J. Day
2009-06-29 18:15         ` Petr Tesarik
2009-06-29 18:50           ` Robert P. J. Day
2009-06-30  6:12             ` Petr Tesarik
2009-06-30 10:18               ` Robert P. J. Day
2009-04-24 13:51     ` Robert P. J. Day
2009-05-28 12:21 ` Petr Tesarik
2009-05-28 12:27   ` Robert P. J. Day
2009-05-28 12:32   ` Robert P. J. Day
2009-05-28 13:12     ` Petr Tesarik
2009-06-29 18:50       ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.0904231339080.13089@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=rpjday@crashcourse.ca \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox