From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: Bug in arch/x86/include/asm/boot.h [Was: next cleanup report: "bad" references to CONFIG variables]
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:27:18 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0906251521430.12376@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090625192412.GA15823@uranus.ravnborg.org>
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> If you continue this then please filter the know false positives.
> For once start ignoring defconfigs.
just to be clear, yes, there are numerous output lines from
defconfig files, but a simple entry in a defconfig file can never
*contribute* to something being flagged as bad or unused. all those
lines represent is the subsequent global search once something *has*
been flagged as unused or bad, just to show where it occurs anywhere
in the tree (which is sometimes informative).
if a variable occurred *only* in defconfig files, it would be
ignored and nothing would be printed for it. but if that defconfig
output has no value, i can toss it.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry.
Web page: http://crashcourse.ca
Linked In: http://www.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
========================================================================
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-25 19:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-25 14:34 next cleanup report: "bad" references to CONFIG variables Robert P. J. Day
2009-06-25 19:24 ` Bug in arch/x86/include/asm/boot.h [Was: next cleanup report: "bad" references to CONFIG variables] Sam Ravnborg
2009-06-25 19:27 ` Robert P. J. Day [this message]
2009-06-25 20:44 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-06-25 21:43 ` Robert P. J. Day
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.0906251521430.12376@localhost \
--to=rpjday@crashcourse.ca \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox