From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752908AbZHMDxV (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:53:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751967AbZHMDxT (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:53:19 -0400 Received: from vms173001pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.1]:28233 "EHLO vms173001pub.verizon.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752836AbZHMDxT (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:53:19 -0400 Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:53:15 -0400 (EDT) From: Len Brown X-X-Sender: lenb@localhost.localdomain To: Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Regression in ACPI in 2.6.31-rc5 In-reply-to: <200908072333.24631.storm@sys49152.net> Message-id: References: <200908072333.24631.storm@sys49152.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I had two drivers stop working in 2.6.31 that were working fine in 2.6.30. > They are iwlagn and sky2. If i pass acpi=off to the kernel, they work as > expected. the bug report for this issue is here: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13940 is it possible to bisect which commit between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31-rc5 caused this regression? Please attach the dmesg from the working 2.6.30 and the acpi=off 2.6.31 to the bug report so i can compare them to the failing 2.6.31 thanks, Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center