The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	feng.tang@intel.com, Fr??d??ric Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	jakub@redhat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:39:18 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0911191934130.24119@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B058C76.9090609@redhat.com>

On Thu, 19 Nov 2009, Andrew Haley wrote:
> OK, I found it.  There is a struct defined as
> 
> struct entry {
>  ...
> } __attribute__((__aligned__((1 << (4)))));
> 
> and then in timer_stats_update_stats you have a local variable of type
> struct entry:
> 
> void timer_stats_update_stats()
> {
>  spinlock_t *lock;
>  struct entry *entry, input;
> 
> So, gcc has to 16-align the stack pointer to satisfy the alignment
> for struct entry.

This does not explain why GCC < 4.4.x actually puts

     push %ebp
     mov  %esp, %ebp

first and why GCC 4.4.x decides to create an extra copy of the return
address instead of just keeping the mcount stack magic right at the
function entry.

Thanks,

	tglx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-11-19 18:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 106+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200911172214.nAHMEBh2023787@imap1.linux-foundation.org>
2009-11-18 19:30 ` [patch for 2.6.32? 1/3] hrtimers: remove the "timer_stats_active" check when setting the start info Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-18 20:24   ` [tip:timers/urgent] hrtimer: Fix /proc/timer_list regression tip-bot for Feng Tang
2009-11-19  7:20     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-19 10:05       ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-19 14:30         ` BUG: function graph tracer function frame assumptions Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-19 15:37           ` BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-19 15:44             ` Andrew Haley
2009-11-19 15:54               ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-19 15:57                 ` Richard Guenther
2009-11-19 16:02               ` Steven Rostedt
2009-11-19 16:11                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-19 16:19                 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-19 16:06               ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-19 16:17                 ` Andrew Haley
2009-11-19 16:43                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-19 16:12               ` Steven Rostedt
2009-11-19 15:45             ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-19 15:49               ` Richard Guenther
2009-11-19 15:52                 ` Richard Guenther
2009-11-19 17:37                 ` Andi Kleen
2009-11-19 17:39             ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-19 17:51               ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-19 17:59               ` Steven Rostedt
2009-11-19 18:03                 ` Richard Guenther
2009-11-19 18:22                   ` Andrew Haley
2009-11-19 18:41                     ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-19 18:43                       ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-19 18:54                         ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-19 19:01                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-23  9:16                             ` Jakub Jelinek
2009-11-23  9:51                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-19 19:10                           ` David Daney
2009-11-19 19:28                             ` Steven Rostedt
2009-11-19 19:46                               ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-19 19:54                                 ` Kai Tietz
2009-11-19 20:05                                   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-19 20:05                                 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-11-19 20:17                                   ` Steven Rostedt
2009-11-19 20:28                                     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-19 20:25                                   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-19 20:36                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-19 20:44                                       ` Steven Rostedt
2009-11-19 19:50                               ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-19 20:06                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-19 21:12                                   ` Jeff Law
2009-11-19 20:10                                 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-11-19 21:05                                 ` Jeff Law
2009-11-19 18:31                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-19 18:38                   ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-19 18:47                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-19 19:06                       ` Steven Rostedt
2009-11-19 19:50                         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-20  9:57                         ` [PATCH] gcc mcount-nofp was " Andi Kleen
2009-11-20 12:34                           ` Steven Rostedt
2009-11-20 19:06                             ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-19 20:36                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-19 18:20             ` Andrew Haley
2009-11-19 18:33               ` Steven Rostedt
2009-11-19 18:36                 ` Andrew Pinski
2009-11-19 18:36                 ` Andrew Haley
2009-11-19 18:37                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-19 18:39               ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2009-11-20  5:23           ` [PATCH][GIT PULL][v2.6.32] tracing/x86: Add check to detect GCC messing with mcount prologue Steven Rostedt
2009-11-20  5:32             ` Steven Rostedt
2009-11-20 17:00             ` Steven Rostedt
2009-11-20 17:13               ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-20 19:35               ` Andrew Haley
2009-11-20 19:46                 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-11-20 19:49                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-22  9:38                 ` H.J. Lu
2009-11-22 17:20                   ` Andrew Haley
2009-11-22 23:30                     ` H.J. Lu
2009-11-24 14:43                       ` Andrew Haley
2009-11-24 14:55                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-24 15:06                           ` Jakub Jelinek
2009-11-24 15:32                             ` Andrew Haley
2009-11-24 15:36                               ` Jakub Jelinek
2009-11-24 15:46                                 ` Andrew Haley
2009-11-24 16:38                                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-24 17:12                                     ` Andrew Haley
2009-11-24 17:30                                       ` Steven Rostedt
2009-11-25 20:05                                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-24 19:55                                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-25 15:29                             ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-25 15:44                               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-25 15:53                                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-25 16:25                                   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-25 16:44                                 ` Jakub Jelinek
2009-11-25 20:12                                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-25 21:00                                     ` Andrew Haley
2009-11-22  9:05               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-20 10:30   ` [tip:timers/urgent] hrtimer: Fix /proc/timer_list regression tip-bot for Feng Tang
2009-11-20 14:19     ` Heiko Carstens
2009-11-19 20:48 BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions H. Peter Anvin
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-11-19 21:14 H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-19 21:25 ` Jeff Law
2009-11-19 22:43   ` Steven Rostedt
2009-11-19 23:58     ` Jeff Law
2009-11-20  0:36       ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-20  0:59         ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-20  1:27           ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-20  2:14             ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-20  1:29           ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-20  5:36           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-20 12:04         ` Andrew Haley
2009-11-20 12:22           ` Andrew Haley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.0911191934130.24119@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aph@redhat.com \
    --cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox