* any objection to a wide-sweeping "unifdef-y" -> "header-y" change?
@ 2009-12-29 12:26 Robert P. J. Day
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2009-12-29 12:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
given that the Kbuild "unifdef-y" directive was tagged as obsolete
in favour of "header-y" well over a year ago, any objection to just
standardizing everything on header-y and removing all support
for unifdef-y?
is there any compelling reason to *not* do that?
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry.
Web page: http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
========================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2009-12-29 12:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-12-29 12:26 any objection to a wide-sweeping "unifdef-y" -> "header-y" change? Robert P. J. Day
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox