From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755364Ab0BUWMO (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Feb 2010 17:12:14 -0500 Received: from www.tglx.de ([62.245.132.106]:58415 "EHLO www.tglx.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755312Ab0BUWMI (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Feb 2010 17:12:08 -0500 Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 23:11:34 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Maciej Rutecki , Arjan van de Ven , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [Bug #14657] perf subsystem breakage in 2.6.32-rc7 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <4u4d-2M3yXH.A.XW.XqagLB@chimera> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 21 Feb 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14657 > Subject : perf subsystem breakage in 2.6.32-rc7 > Submitter : Arjan van de Ven > Date : 2009-11-19 19:50 (95 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125866013419738&w=4 Can we please take that off the list? That bisect result is more than silly and we never got any useful information about that "problem". Thanks, tglx