From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756576Ab0CDXG1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Mar 2010 18:06:27 -0500 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:39481 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754137Ab0CDXG0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Mar 2010 18:06:26 -0500 Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 15:06:17 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds X-X-Sender: torvalds@localhost.localdomain To: Andrew Morton cc: Joe Perches , Nick Andrew , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/2] Make functions of dev_ macros, recursive vsnprintf In-Reply-To: <20100304143837.af39845d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Message-ID: References: <20100304143837.af39845d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Andrew Morton wrote: > > What would I need to do to make it recur more than once? Include a %pV > in a string, like dev_printk("%s", %%pV")? I would argue that if somebody does that, they're just broken. The single level of recursion is really nice - it solves a real annoyance. But if somebody starts trying to do multiple levels, that's just crazy. Of course, I guess we don't relly have any way of sanely _counting_ the recursion level, so we'd have to just trust people to not do crazy things. And that's a big thing to take on trust ;) Linus