From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753679Ab0CFWDR (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Mar 2010 17:03:17 -0500 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:53123 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753506Ab0CFWDQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Mar 2010 17:03:16 -0500 Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2010 14:03:02 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds X-X-Sender: torvalds@localhost.localdomain To: Joe Perches cc: Andrew Morton , Nick Andrew , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/2] Make functions of dev_ macros, recursive vsnprintf In-Reply-To: <1267911399.849.39.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> Message-ID: References: <20100304143837.af39845d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1267911399.849.39.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 6 Mar 2010, Joe Perches wrote: > > Is that an ack, a nack or a get the hell out? It's mostly an Ack. I think the concept is great. I'd love to have some way to limit recursion, and I'd also love to see some actual numbers of how deep the vsnprintf stack frame is, but I don't see how to do the first, and I'm hoping the second isn't too horrible. Linus