From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: should new kfifo implementation really be exporting that much?
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 10:57:29 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1003141053380.5987@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1003140929350.4644@localhost>
On Sun, 14 Mar 2010, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> just curious about how much is being exported from kfifo.c:
>
> $ grep EXPORT_SYMBOL kernel/kfifo.c
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(kfifo_init);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(kfifo_alloc);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(kfifo_free);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(kfifo_skip);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(__kfifo_in_n);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(kfifo_in);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(__kfifo_in_generic);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(__kfifo_out_n);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(kfifo_out);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(kfifo_out_peek);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(__kfifo_out_generic);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(__kfifo_from_user_n);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(kfifo_from_user);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(__kfifo_from_user_generic);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(__kfifo_to_user_n);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(kfifo_to_user);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(__kfifo_to_user_generic);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(__kfifo_peek_generic);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(__kfifo_skip_generic);
> $
>
> there's a lot there that looks like it should be static, no? or is
> all of that *meant* to be part of the public kfifo API?
as a short followup, kfifo.h strongly implies that a lot of the
above shouldn't be exported:
...
/*
* __kfifo_in_... internal functions for put date into the fifo
* do not call it directly, use kfifo_in_rec() instead
*/
...
/*
* __kfifo_out_... internal functions for get date from the fifo
* do not call it directly, use kfifo_out_rec() instead
*/
...
/*
* __kfifo_from_user_... internal functions for transfer from user space into
* the fifo. do not call it directly, use kfifo_from_user_rec() instead
*/
...
/*
* __kfifo_to_user_... internal functions for transfer fifo data into user space
* do not call it directly, use kfifo_to_user_rec() instead
*/
...
/*
* __kfifo_peek_... internal functions for peek into the next fifo record
* do not call it directly, use kfifo_peek_rec() instead
*/
...
/*
* __kfifo_skip_... internal functions for skip the next fifo record
* do not call it directly, use kfifo_skip_rec() instead
*/
...
anyway, you get the idea. it would seem that a lot of those EXPORTs
should be removed, no?
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry.
Web page: http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
========================================================================
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-14 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-14 13:32 should new kfifo implementation really be exporting that much? Robert P. J. Day
2010-03-14 14:57 ` Robert P. J. Day [this message]
2010-03-14 16:37 ` Tilman Schmidt
2010-03-14 16:49 ` Robert P. J. Day
2010-03-21 9:32 ` Jon Masters
2010-03-22 14:32 ` Robert P. J. Day
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.1003141053380.5987@localhost \
--to=rpjday@crashcourse.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox