public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
To: Jon Masters <jonathan@jonmasters.org>
Cc: Tilman Schmidt <t.schmidt@phoenixsoftware.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: should new kfifo implementation really be exporting that much?
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:32:32 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1003221030360.25001@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100321093207.GX4426@perihelion.bos.jonmasters.org>

On Sun, 21 Mar 2010, Jon Masters wrote:

> On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 12:49:08PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > On Sun, 14 Mar 2010, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
> >
> > > Am 14.03.2010 15:57 schrieb Robert P. J. Day:
> > > >   as a short followup, kfifo.h strongly implies that a lot of the
> > > > above shouldn't be exported:
> > > >
> > > > ...
> > > > /*
> > > >  * __kfifo_in_... internal functions for put date into the fifo
> > > >  * do not call it directly, use kfifo_in_rec() instead
> > > >  */
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > >   anyway, you get the idea.  it would seem that a lot of those EXPORTs
> > > > should be removed, no?
> > >
> > > If you look at kfifo_in_rec(), it's a static inline void
> > > function defined in kfifo.h and which calls __kfifo_in_generic()
> > > or __kfifo_in_rec(). I don't think you'll be able to make that
> > > work without exporting those functions.
> >
> >   huh.  i believe you're correct.  i'll take a closer look but i
> > still get this feeling that there's something ... messy about that
> > API. case in point:  kfifo_in_rec() is *not* being exported, but a
> > routine that it invokes -- __kfifo_in_generic() -- *is* being
> > exported. doesn't that just seem a bit backwards?
>
> I believe it would be a good idea to have an export type explicitly
> covering symbols that are exported solely for the use of inlines,
> just for tidying up these situations. EXPORT_SYMBOL_INTERNAL?

  i wasn't suggesting anything as drastic as inventing a new export
level :-), i just wanted to verify that the current situation as to
what's currently exported related to kfifo just seemed a bit odd and
inconsistent.  but a new export level might support the removal of a
considerable amount from the fully-exported namespace.

rday
--

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                               Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

            Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry.

Web page:                                          http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
========================================================================

      reply	other threads:[~2010-03-22 14:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-14 13:32 should new kfifo implementation really be exporting that much? Robert P. J. Day
2010-03-14 14:57 ` Robert P. J. Day
2010-03-14 16:37   ` Tilman Schmidt
2010-03-14 16:49     ` Robert P. J. Day
2010-03-21  9:32       ` Jon Masters
2010-03-22 14:32         ` Robert P. J. Day [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.1003221030360.25001@localhost \
    --to=rpjday@crashcourse.ca \
    --cc=jonathan@jonmasters.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=t.schmidt@phoenixsoftware.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox