public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
To: "Jörn Engel" <joern@logfs.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Jan Blunck <jblunck@gmail.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] logfs: push down BKL into ioctl function
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 17:27:19 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1004271725490.3318@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100427150919.GB16794@logfs.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 1091 bytes --]



On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, Jörn Engel wrote:

> On Tue, 27 April 2010 17:05:50 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tuesday 27 April 2010, Jörn Engel wrote:
> > > On Tue, 27 April 2010 16:24:19 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > I'm sure that logfs doesn't rely on the BKL, but right now,
> > > > we're just pushing it down.
> > > 
> > > So why do you create logfs_unlocked_ioctl in the first place? ;)
> > 
> > I don't want to get caught in discussions on whether any of my patches
> > might introduce silent bugs in something I'm not maintaining. Also
> > to put pressure on maintainers by threatening them to make their code
> > ugly.
> > 
> > If you just add a patch to convert to ->unlocked_ioctl without
> > the BKL, we can drop this patch ;-)
> 
> I guess that's threatening enough.  Is this for the next merge window or
> still the current one?
> 

Hasn't the "current" merge window been over with for weeks? I was assuming 
that bkl push down, or other bkl patches are for the next merge window.

You can ask Linus whether he'll take a convert unlocked_ioctl now or not.

John

  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-27 15:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-27  9:18 [PATCH 00/10] bkl: pushdowns from Arnd, and compile fixes John Kacur
2010-04-27  9:18 ` [PATCH 01/10] dvb: push down BKL into ioctl functions John Kacur
2010-04-27  9:18 ` [PATCH 02/10] scsi: " John Kacur
2010-04-27  9:18 ` [PATCH 03/10] bkl: Fix up compile problems in megaraid from bkl push-down John Kacur
2010-04-27  9:18 ` [PATCH 04/10] bkl: Fix missing inode tw_chrdev_ioctl due to bkl pushdown John Kacur
2010-04-27  9:18 ` [PATCH 05/10] bkl: Fix missing inode in twl_chrdev_ioctl resulting from " John Kacur
2010-04-27  9:18 ` [PATCH 06/10] isdn: push down BKL into ioctl functions John Kacur
2010-04-27  9:18 ` [PATCH 07/10] staging: " John Kacur
2010-04-27  9:18 ` [PATCH 08/10] v4l: always use unlocked_ioctl John Kacur
2010-04-27  9:18 ` [PATCH 09/10] drivers: push down BKL into various drivers John Kacur
2010-04-27  9:18 ` [PATCH 10/10] bkl: Fix-up compile problems as a result of the bkl-pushdown John Kacur
2010-04-27 11:17   ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-27 11:54     ` John Kacur
2010-04-27 13:03       ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-28 12:24         ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2010-04-28 12:37           ` Hans Verkuil
2010-04-28 13:02             ` Laurent Pinchart
2010-04-28 14:46               ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2010-04-28 14:55         ` Linus Torvalds
2010-04-28 21:52           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-29  3:42           ` [PATCH 0/5] Pushdown bkl from v4l ioctls Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-29  6:44             ` Hans Verkuil
2010-04-29  7:10               ` Laurent Pinchart
2010-04-29  7:38                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-01  9:55                 ` Hans Verkuil
2010-05-01 10:47                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-01 14:58                   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-01 11:11               ` Alan Cox
2010-04-29  3:42           ` [PATCH 1/5] v4l: Pushdown bkl into video_ioctl2 Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-29  3:42           ` [PATCH 2/5] v4l: Use video_ioctl2_unlocked from drivers that don't want the bkl Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-29  3:42           ` [PATCH 3/5] v4l: Change users of video_ioctl2 to use unlocked_ioctl Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-29  3:42           ` [PATCH 4/5] v4l: Pushdown bkl to drivers that implement their own ioctl Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-29  3:42           ` [PATCH 5/5] v4l: Remove struct v4l2_file_operations::ioctl Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-27 11:31 ` [PATCH 00/10] bkl: pushdowns from Arnd, and compile fixes Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-27 12:19   ` John Kacur
2010-04-27 12:41     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-27 14:24     ` [PATCH 0/6] BKL pushdown into ioctl, continued Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-27 14:24     ` [PATCH 1/7] logfs: push down BKL into ioctl function Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-27 14:32       ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-27 14:58       ` Jörn Engel
2010-04-27 15:05         ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-27 15:09           ` Jörn Engel
2010-04-27 15:27             ` John Kacur [this message]
2010-04-27 15:32               ` Jörn Engel
2010-04-27 15:38                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-27 20:12                   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-27 20:30                     ` [PATCH] logfs: kill BKL Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-19 12:51                       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-27 15:36               ` [PATCH 1/7] logfs: push down BKL into ioctl function Linus Torvalds
2010-04-27 16:29                 ` John Kacur
2010-04-27 19:59       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-27 14:24     ` [PATCH 2/7] hfsplus: " Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-27 14:24     ` [PATCH 3/7] cris: push down BKL into some device drivers Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-27 17:22       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-30  7:53       ` Jesper Nilsson
2010-05-17  2:51         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-27 14:24     ` [PATCH 4/7] sn_hwperf: kill BKL usage Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-27 14:24     ` [PATCH 5/7] um/mmapper: remove " Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-27 14:24     ` [PATCH 6/7] coda/psdev: remove BKL from ioctl function Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-27 14:24     ` [PATCH 7/7] smbfs: push down BKL into " Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-27 12:40   ` [PATCH 00/10] bkl: pushdowns from Arnd, and compile fixes Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-27 12:51   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-04-28 21:18 ` Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.1004271725490.3318@localhost \
    --to=jkacur@redhat.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jblunck@gmail.com \
    --cc=joern@logfs.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox