From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752903Ab0ESPde (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 May 2010 11:33:34 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:37678 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752611Ab0ESPdc (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 May 2010 11:33:32 -0400 Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 08:30:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Nick Piggin cc: Steven Rostedt , Mathieu Desnoyers , Peter Zijlstra , Frederic Weisbecker , Pierre Tardy , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Tom Zanussi , Paul Mackerras , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arjan@infradead.org, ziga.mahkovec@gmail.com, davem , linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , KOSAKI Motohiro , Christoph Lameter , Tejun Heo , Jens Axboe Subject: Re: Unexpected splice "always copy" behavior observed In-Reply-To: <20100519151726.GB2516@laptop> Message-ID: References: <20100518153440.GB7748@Krystal> <1274197993.26328.755.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <1274199039.26328.758.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <20100519063116.GR2516@laptop> <20100519151726.GB2516@laptop> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 20 May 2010, Nick Piggin wrote: > > Well I mean a full invalidate -- invalidate_mapping_pages -- so there is > literally no pagecache there at all. Umm. That won't work. Think mapped pages. You can't handle them atomically, so somebody will page-fault them in. So you'd have to have a "invalidate_and_replace()" to do it atomically while holding the mapping spinlock or something. And WHAT IS THE POINT? That will be about a million times slower than just doing the effing copy in the first place! Memory copies are _not_ slow. Not compared to taking locks and doing TLB invalidates. Linus