public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Lukáš Czerner" <lczerner@redhat.com>
To: Tomas Racek <tracek@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, lczerner@redhat.com,
	Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>, Alex Elder <elder@kernel.org>,
	"supporter:XFS FILESYSTEM" <xfs@oss.sgi.com>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xfs: check for possible overflow in xfs_ioc_trim
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 09:22:01 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1208080909330.19417@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1343828737-5324-1-git-send-email-tracek@redhat.com>

On Wed, 1 Aug 2012, Tomas Racek wrote:

> Date: Wed,  1 Aug 2012 15:45:37 +0200
> From: Tomas Racek <tracek@redhat.com>
> To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: lczerner@redhat.com, Tomas Racek <tracek@redhat.com>,
>     Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>, Alex Elder <elder@kernel.org>,
>     "supporter:XFS FILESYSTEM" <xfs@oss.sgi.com>,
>     open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> Subject: [PATCH v2] xfs: check for possible overflow in xfs_ioc_trim
> 
> If range.start points behind the filesystem, return invalid value error.
> This fixes possible overflow in
> 
> start = BTOBB(range.start)
> 
> when range.start is nearly ULLONG_MAX.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tomas Racek <tracek@redhat.com>

The fix looks good to me, but I have one comment bellow.

> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_discard.c |    5 +++--
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_discard.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_discard.c
> index f9c3fe3..33d367f 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_discard.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_discard.c
> @@ -179,12 +179,13 @@ xfs_ioc_trim(
>  	 * used by the fstrim application.  In the end it really doesn't
>  	 * matter as trimming blocks is an advisory interface.
>  	 */
> +	if (range.start >= XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks))
> +		return -XFS_ERROR(EINVAL);
> +
>  	start = BTOBB(range.start);
>  	end = start + BTOBBT(range.len) - 1;
>  	minlen = BTOBB(max_t(u64, granularity, range.minlen));

It seems that we have the same problem here with range.minlen. It
is highly unlikely and stupid from the user space to send minlen of
such size, but it is possible.

Thanks!
-Lukas

>  
> -	if (XFS_BB_TO_FSB(mp, start) >= mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks)
> -		return -XFS_ERROR(EINVAL);
>  	if (end > XFS_FSB_TO_BB(mp, mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks) - 1)
>  		end = XFS_FSB_TO_BB(mp, mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks)- 1;
>  
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2012-08-08  7:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-01 13:45 [PATCH v2] xfs: check for possible overflow in xfs_ioc_trim Tomas Racek
2012-08-08  7:22 ` Lukáš Czerner [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.1208080909330.19417@localhost \
    --to=lczerner@redhat.com \
    --cc=bpm@sgi.com \
    --cc=elder@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tracek@redhat.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox