From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@gmail.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
niel.lambrechts@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Probe Timeouts with 47afbaf5af9454a7a1a64591e20cbfcc27ca67a8
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 11:33:32 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0905111126320.3586@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1242066170.3873.43.camel@johannes.local>
On Mon, 11 May 2009, Johannes Berg wrote:
>
> I always only said it was fixed in wireless-testing and that the fix was
> on the way upstream. I have no influence over more.
Well, since I can't seem to reproduce the problems I had, and since it's
possible that it wasn't the revert as much as just the reboot itself that
cleared things up for me, right now I can no longer check one way or the
other.
Earlier, it looked like just reverting that commit ended up fixing things,
which made me very unhappy, since:
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=c428c89201a57a0ce24c37ed79e540d1f4101cf3
>
> What does "older" mean here, and what kernel were you using?
"older" means a few years old. It's a compaq/hp 2510p that I've bug out in
preparation for late-rc 2.6.30 testing to see that everything works fine.
And the kernel I'm using is top-of-git, so that fix was there.
Which was obviously exactly why I was so unhappy about this, since the
revert seemed to fix problems for me _despite_ the fix.
But now that I can't re-create it, I must assume that it was some other
random thing unrelated to the revert.
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-11 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-01 1:38 Probe Timeouts with 47afbaf5af9454a7a1a64591e20cbfcc27ca67a8 Parag Warudkar
2009-05-01 8:16 ` Johannes Berg
2009-05-01 13:19 ` Parag Warudkar
2009-05-11 17:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-05-11 18:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-05-11 18:22 ` Johannes Berg
2009-05-11 18:33 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2009-05-11 18:52 ` Johannes Berg
2009-05-11 19:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-05-11 20:21 ` Frans Pop
2009-05-01 20:28 ` Parag Warudkar
2009-05-02 8:27 ` Johannes Berg
2009-05-02 11:20 ` Parag Warudkar
2009-05-02 16:44 ` Johannes Berg
2009-05-02 18:13 ` Parag Warudkar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.01.0905111126320.3586@localhost.localdomain \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=niel.lambrechts@gmail.com \
--cc=parag.lkml@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox