From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
"jeremy@goop.org" <jeremy@goop.org>,
"mingo@elte.hu" <mingo@elte.hu>,
Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>,
"avi@redhat.com" <avi@redhat.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@eu.citrix.com>,
"gregkh@suse.de" <gregkh@suse.de>,
"kurt.hackel@oracle.com" <kurt.hackel@oracle.com>,
Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@eu.citrix.com>,
"xen-users@lists.xensource.com" <xen-users@lists.xensource.com>,
ksrinivasan <ksrinivasan@novell.com>,
"EAnderson@novell.com" <EAnderson@novell.com>,
"wimcoekaerts@wimmekes.net" <wimcoekaerts@wimmekes.net>,
Stephen Spector <stephen.spector@citrix.com>,
"jens.axboe@oracle.com" <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
"npiggin@suse.de" <npiggin@suse.de>
Subject: Re: Xen is a feature
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:46:05 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0906021033230.3351@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A25564A.70608@eu.citrix.com>
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, George Dunlap wrote:
>
> idea that changes shouldn't introduce performance regressions. But there are
> patchqueues that are ready, signed-off by other maintainers, and which Ingo
> admits that he has no technical objections to, but refuses to merge.
I've seen technical objects in this thread. The whole thing _started_ with
one, and Thomas brought up others.
As a top-level maintainer, I can also very much sympathise with the "don't
merge new stuff if there are known problems and no known solutions to
those issues". Is Ingo supposed to just continue to merge crap, when it's
admitted that it has problems and pollutes code that he has to maintain?
The fact is (and this is a _fact_): Xen is a total mess from a development
standpoint. I talked about this in private with Jeremy. Xen pollutes the
architecture code in ways that NO OTHER subsystem does. And I have never
EVER seen the Xen developers really acknowledge that and try to fix it.
Thomas pointed to patches that add _explicitly_ Xen-related special cases
that aren't even trying to make sense. See the local apic thing.
So quite frankly, I wish some of the Xen people looked themselves in the
mirror, and then asked themselves "would _I_ merge something ugly like
that, if it was filling my subsystem with totally unrelated hacks for some
other crap"?
Seriously.
If it was just the local APIC, fine. But it may be just the local APIC
code this time around, next time it will be something else. It's been TLB,
it's been entry_*.S, it's been all over. Some of them are performance
issues.
I dunno. I just do know that I pointed out the statistics for how
mindlessly incestuous the Xen patches have historically been to Jeremy. He
admitted it. I've not seen _anybody_ say that things will improve.
Xen has been painful. If you give maintainers pain, don't expect them to
love you or respect you.
So I would really suggest that Xen people should look at _why_ they are
giving maintainers so much pain.
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-02 17:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 108+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-12 23:25 [GIT PULL] Xen APIC hooks (with io_apic_ops) Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-05-12 23:25 ` [PATCH 01/17] xen/dom0: handle acpi lapic parsing in Xen dom0 Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-05-12 23:25 ` [PATCH 02/17] x86: add io_apic_ops to allow interception Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-05-25 3:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-27 7:17 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-05-12 23:25 ` [PATCH 03/17] xen: implement io_apic_ops Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-05-12 23:25 ` [PATCH 04/17] xen: create dummy ioapic mapping Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-05-12 23:25 ` [PATCH 05/17] xen: implement pirq type event channels Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-05-12 23:25 ` [PATCH 06/17] x86/io_apic: add get_nr_irqs_gsi() Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-05-12 23:25 ` [PATCH 07/17] xen/apic: identity map gsi->irqs Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-05-12 23:25 ` [PATCH 08/17] xen: direct irq registration to pirq event channels Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-05-12 23:25 ` [PATCH 09/17] xen: bind pirq to vector and event channel Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-05-12 23:25 ` [PATCH 10/17] xen: pre-initialize legacy irqs early Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-05-12 23:25 ` [PATCH 11/17] xen: don't setup acpi interrupt unless there is one Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-05-12 23:25 ` [PATCH 12/17] xen: use acpi_get_override_irq() to get triggering for legacy irqs Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-05-12 23:25 ` [PATCH 13/17] xen: initialize irq 0 too Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-05-12 23:25 ` [PATCH 14/17] xen: dynamically allocate irq & event structures Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-05-12 23:25 ` [PATCH 15/17] xen: set pirq name to something useful Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-05-12 23:25 ` [PATCH 16/17] xen: fix legacy irq setup, make ioapic-less machines work Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-05-12 23:25 ` [PATCH 17/17] xen: disable MSI Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-05-19 12:35 ` [GIT PULL] Xen APIC hooks (with io_apic_ops) Ingo Molnar
2009-05-20 17:57 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-05-25 4:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-26 12:46 ` [Xen-devel] " George Dunlap
2009-05-26 18:26 ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-26 19:18 ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-05-26 19:41 ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-28 0:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-28 0:49 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-05-28 3:47 ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-05-28 14:26 ` George Dunlap
2009-05-29 0:45 ` Xen is a feature Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-05-29 1:27 ` Greg KH
2009-05-29 4:05 ` David Miller
2009-05-29 6:37 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-05-29 6:51 ` David Miller
2009-05-29 12:01 ` George Dunlap
2009-05-29 14:14 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2009-05-29 21:29 ` David Miller
[not found] ` <87tz33ep1b.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
2009-05-29 21:31 ` [Xen-devel] " Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-05-29 23:09 ` Nakajima, Jun
2009-05-29 23:26 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-06-02 15:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-06-02 16:41 ` George Dunlap
2009-06-02 17:28 ` Chris Friesen
2009-06-02 17:46 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2009-06-02 18:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-02 18:59 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-07 9:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-07 10:01 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-07 10:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-07 12:46 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-07 13:02 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-04 14:02 ` [Xen-users] " Thomas Goirand
2009-06-02 18:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-06-03 19:49 ` Bill Davidsen
2009-06-03 20:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-06-03 22:37 ` Bill Davidsen
2009-06-03 23:29 ` Frans Pop
2009-06-04 13:21 ` George Dunlap
2009-06-04 15:10 ` Theodore Tso
2009-06-04 15:31 ` Chris Friesen
2009-06-05 4:14 ` Bill Davidsen
2009-06-05 4:55 ` Chris Friesen
2009-06-02 22:40 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-06-02 23:28 ` Merge Xen (the hypervisor) into Linux Ingo Molnar
2009-06-03 0:00 ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-06-03 0:32 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-06-03 2:43 ` Theodore Tso
2009-06-03 3:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-06-03 4:49 ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-06-03 4:58 ` David Miller
2009-06-03 5:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-06-03 5:22 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-06-03 12:03 ` George Dunlap
2009-06-03 19:05 ` Theodore Tso
[not found] ` <4A27CF94.1050903@gmx.de>
2009-06-04 14:03 ` [Xen-users] " Steven Rostedt
2009-06-03 7:28 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-06-03 8:47 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-03 9:09 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-06-03 9:20 ` Keir Fraser
2009-06-03 11:15 ` Theodore Tso
2009-06-03 11:39 ` Keir Fraser
2009-06-03 11:41 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-06-03 1:00 ` Joel Becker
2009-06-03 2:00 ` david
2009-06-03 7:59 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-03 8:07 ` Christian Tramnitz
2009-06-04 18:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-05 0:09 ` Samuel Thibault
2009-06-05 0:18 ` David Miller
2009-06-05 0:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-03 17:31 ` Chris Friesen
2009-06-03 17:36 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-02 23:41 ` Xen is a feature Thomas Gleixner
2009-05-30 2:19 ` [Xen-devel] " Andy Burns
2009-05-26 21:19 ` [Xen-devel] Re: [GIT PULL] Xen APIC hooks (with io_apic_ops) Gerd Hoffmann
2009-05-27 10:14 ` George Dunlap
2009-05-24 20:10 ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-25 3:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-25 4:55 ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-25 5:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-25 5:12 ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-25 5:19 ` Ingo Molnar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-29 11:48 Xen is a feature Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-05-29 13:08 Sander Eikelenboom
2009-05-31 21:11 devzero
2009-06-02 22:44 Sander Eikelenboom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.01.0906021033230.3351@localhost.localdomain \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=EAnderson@novell.com \
--cc=Ian.Pratt@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Keir.Fraser@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=dan.magenheimer@oracle.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=ksrinivasan@novell.com \
--cc=kurt.hackel@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=stephen.spector@citrix.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wimcoekaerts@wimmekes.net \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
--cc=xen-users@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox