From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Additional x86 fixes for 2.6.31-rc5
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 19:14:11 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0908021913130.3352@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A76421E.3040005@kernel.org>
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> Do you want to queue it for 2.6.31?
Yeah, no.
> Given that the generated code
> changes compared to the previous kernels (both pre and post percpu
> stuff), I think it would be safer to queue it for 2.6.32 window. I
> would be happy to carry it in the percpu tree.
Please do. I don't want it for 31, and I do want it to get more testing. I
ran with it for a few days, and saw no problems, and it looked obvious
enough, but there just isn't any overriding reason for it to be in 31.
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-03 2:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-31 18:13 [GIT PULL] Additional x86 fixes for 2.6.31-rc5 H. Peter Anvin
2009-07-31 19:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-31 19:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-01 19:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-08-01 19:38 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-08-01 22:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-08-01 22:35 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-08-02 1:20 ` Paul Mackerras
2009-08-02 3:52 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-08-03 1:01 ` Tejun Heo
2009-08-03 1:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-08-03 1:49 ` Tejun Heo
2009-08-03 2:14 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2009-08-03 5:08 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86: Add 'percpu_read_stable()' interface for cacheable accesses Tejun Heo
2009-08-03 5:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-08-03 5:18 ` Tejun Heo
2009-08-03 6:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-03 6:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-08-03 6:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-03 7:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-03 15:13 ` [PATCH 1/3 UPDATED] x86, percpu: " Tejun Heo
2009-08-03 5:10 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86,percpu: fix DECLARE/DEFINE_PER_CPU_PAGE_ALIGNED() Tejun Heo
2009-08-03 5:12 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86: collect hot percpu variables into one cacheline Tejun Heo
2009-08-05 7:34 ` [GIT PULL] Additional x86 fixes for 2.6.31-rc5 Tan, Wei Chong
2009-08-05 8:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-10 0:42 ` Tan, Wei Chong
2009-08-10 9:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-10 15:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-08-10 9:06 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86: Fix serialization in pit_expect_msb() tip-bot for Linus Torvalds
2009-08-10 18:01 ` tip-bot for Linus Torvalds
2009-08-05 23:10 ` [GIT PULL] Additional x86 fixes for 2.6.31-rc5 Tan, Wei Chong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.01.0908021913130.3352@localhost.localdomain \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox