From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@mail.by>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] tty-ldisc: make refcount be atomic_t 'users' count
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 10:58:29 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0908031055400.3208@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0908031047010.3208@localhost.localdomain>
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 10:07:09 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] tty-ldisc: make refcount be atomic_t 'users' count
This is pure preparation of changing the ldisc reference counting to be
a true refcount that defines the lifetime of the ldisc. But this is a
purely syntactic change for now to make the next steps easier.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---
This patch should make no semantic changes at all. But I wanted to make
the ldisc refcount be an atomic (I will be touching it without locks soon
enough), and I wanted to rename it so that there isn't quite as much
confusion between 'ldo->refcount' (ldisk operations refcount) and
'ld->refcount' (ldisc refcount itself) in the same file.
So it's now an atomic 'ld->users' count. It still starts at zero, despite
having a reference from 'tty->ldisc', but that will change once we turn it
into a _real_ refcount.
drivers/char/tty_ldisc.c | 18 ++++++++----------
include/linux/tty_ldisc.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/tty_ldisc.c b/drivers/char/tty_ldisc.c
index acd76b7..fd175e6 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tty_ldisc.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tty_ldisc.c
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ static struct tty_ldisc *tty_ldisc_try_get(int disc)
/* lock it */
ldops->refcount++;
ld->ops = ldops;
- ld->refcount = 0;
+ atomic_set(&ld->users, 0);
err = 0;
}
}
@@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ static void tty_ldisc_put(struct tty_ldisc *ld)
ldo->refcount--;
module_put(ldo->owner);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
- WARN_ON(ld->refcount);
+ WARN_ON(atomic_read(&ld->users));
kfree(ld);
}
@@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ static int tty_ldisc_try(struct tty_struct *tty)
spin_lock_irqsave(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
ld = tty->ldisc;
if (test_bit(TTY_LDISC, &tty->flags)) {
- ld->refcount++;
+ atomic_inc(&ld->users);
ret = 1;
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
@@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ struct tty_ldisc *tty_ldisc_ref_wait(struct tty_struct *tty)
{
/* wait_event is a macro */
wait_event(tty_ldisc_wait, tty_ldisc_try(tty));
- WARN_ON(tty->ldisc->refcount == 0);
+ WARN_ON(atomic_read(&tty->ldisc->users) == 0);
return tty->ldisc;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tty_ldisc_ref_wait);
@@ -365,11 +365,9 @@ void tty_ldisc_deref(struct tty_ldisc *ld)
BUG_ON(ld == NULL);
spin_lock_irqsave(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
- if (ld->refcount == 0)
+ if (atomic_read(&ld->users) == 0)
printk(KERN_ERR "tty_ldisc_deref: no references.\n");
- else
- ld->refcount--;
- if (ld->refcount == 0)
+ else if (atomic_dec_and_test(&ld->users))
wake_up(&tty_ldisc_wait);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
}
@@ -536,10 +534,10 @@ static int tty_ldisc_wait_idle(struct tty_struct *tty)
{
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
- while (tty->ldisc->refcount) {
+ while (atomic_read(&tty->ldisc->users)) {
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
if (wait_event_timeout(tty_ldisc_wait,
- tty->ldisc->refcount == 0, 5 * HZ) == 0)
+ atomic_read(&tty->ldisc->users) == 0, 5 * HZ) == 0)
return -EBUSY;
spin_lock_irqsave(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
}
diff --git a/include/linux/tty_ldisc.h b/include/linux/tty_ldisc.h
index 40f38d8..0c4ee9b 100644
--- a/include/linux/tty_ldisc.h
+++ b/include/linux/tty_ldisc.h
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ struct tty_ldisc_ops {
struct tty_ldisc {
struct tty_ldisc_ops *ops;
- int refcount;
+ atomic_t users;
};
#define TTY_LDISC_MAGIC 0x5403
--
1.6.4.21.g73b866
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-03 17:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-02 12:01 WARNING at: drivers/char/tty_ldisc.c Sergey Senozhatsky
2009-08-02 16:05 ` Greg KH
2009-08-02 17:01 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2009-08-02 17:07 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2009-08-02 17:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-08-02 19:05 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2009-08-02 20:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-08-02 21:17 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-08-02 21:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-08-02 22:46 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2009-08-02 22:48 ` Alan Cox
2009-08-03 0:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-08-03 1:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-08-03 9:37 ` Alan Cox
2009-08-03 16:26 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-08-03 16:59 ` Alan Cox
2009-08-03 17:55 ` [PATCH 0/2] proper tty-ldisc refcounting (was Re: WARNING at: drivers/char/tty_ldisc.c) Linus Torvalds
2009-08-03 17:58 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2009-08-03 18:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] tty-ldisc: turn ldisc user count into a proper refcount Linus Torvalds
2009-08-03 18:39 ` Alan Cox
2009-08-03 20:00 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-08-03 18:18 ` [PATCH 0/2] proper tty-ldisc refcounting (was Re: WARNING at: drivers/char/tty_ldisc.c) Greg KH
2009-08-03 18:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-08-03 22:16 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2009-08-03 22:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-08-03 22:58 ` [PATCH 3/2] tty-ldisc: be more careful in 'put_ldisc' locking Linus Torvalds
2009-08-03 23:00 ` [PATCH 4/2] tty-ldisc: make /proc/tty/ldiscs use ldisc_ops instead of ldiscs Linus Torvalds
2009-08-03 23:01 ` [PATCH 5/2] tty-ldisc: get rid of tty_ldisc_try_get() helper function Linus Torvalds
2009-08-04 0:30 ` proper tty-ldisc refcounting (was Re: WARNING at: drivers/char/tty_ldisc.c) Sergey Senozhatsky
2009-08-04 0:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-08-04 3:53 ` Greg KH
2009-08-04 4:08 ` Greg KH
2009-08-04 6:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-08-04 7:23 ` Greg KH
2009-08-04 9:12 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2009-08-04 14:53 ` Greg KH
2009-08-04 15:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-08-04 16:00 ` Greg KH
2009-08-02 22:15 ` WARNING at: drivers/char/tty_ldisc.c Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.01.0908031055400.3208@localhost.localdomain \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@mail.by \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox