From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753330Ab1ALGWM (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jan 2011 01:22:12 -0500 Received: from vms173011pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.11]:39144 "EHLO vms173011pub.verizon.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751444Ab1ALGWJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jan 2011 01:22:09 -0500 Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 01:22:01 -0500 (EST) From: Len Brown X-X-Sender: lenb@x980 To: Thomas Renninger Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, stable@kernel.org, LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] X86: Cleanup idle= internal variables by getting rid of idle_halt idle_nomwait In-reply-to: <201011051124.49973.trenn@suse.de> Message-id: References: <201011021441.09258.trenn@suse.de> <201011031706.15248.trenn@suse.de> <201011051124.49973.trenn@suse.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (LFD 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > > That function and all these idle workaround flags > > > need to be re-whacked. > > Whatabout this (compile tested (on x86_64/ia64)). > > Adding lkml as this affects x86 core code. > as this mostly affects intel_idle and acpi processor driver, > can you apply this one to your acpi test branch if you are > ok with it. Looks good to me, Thomas, thanks for the follow-up. I don't think it needed for -stable, but it is a good cleanup for upstream. applied to idle-test. thanks, Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center