From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754658Ab1EYWXo (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 May 2011 18:23:44 -0400 Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:55508 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753628Ab1EYWXn (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 May 2011 18:23:43 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 00:23:38 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Kasper Pedersen cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Suresh Siddha , Peter Zijlstra , John Stultz , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Ingo Molnar , Josh Triplett Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] x86: tsc: make TSC calibration immune to interrupts In-Reply-To: <4DDD7D9E.60100@kasperkp.dk> Message-ID: References: <4DDC0B4F.6060202@kasperkp.dk> <4DDD7D9E.60100@kasperkp.dk> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (LFD 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 26 May 2011, Kasper Pedersen wrote: > On 05/25/2011 12:51 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > >> The 8 additional samples costs us 28 microseconds in startup > >> time. > > > > That's a good reason to avoid the whole conditional thing and just do > > the best of 5 always. > > I do not mind removing it again. > The additional 170us only happen when quick_pit_calibrate fails, > and then native_calibrate_tsc burns 30ms extra anyway. Yes, not worth the extra conditional. > >> + > >> + *p = tp; > > > > The value is completely uninteresting when we return ULLONG_MAX. > > > > native_calibrate_tsc() depends on *p being written regardless of > whether we can get a SMI-free reading: > > /* We don't have an alternative source, disable TSC */ > if (!hpet && !ref1 && !ref2) { > printk("TSC: No reference (HPET/PMTIMER) available\n"); > return 0; > } > > this works since acpi_pm_read_early() returns 0 when pmtmr_ioport > is 0, or CONFIG_X86_PM_TIMER is not set. > > Without it we would report "calibration failed" rather than > "No reference" or "Using PIT" when there is neither pmtimer nor > hpet. Fair enough. So a comment might be in order :) That code is fricking complex just to figure out on which frequency that damn thing runs :( Thanks, tglx