* Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.0-rt4 , Follow up question
[not found] <CAF-VNapwgfr66ib9OPcpJO-4K+6F-0VZA2Tc=4Fp==TDPKwkRQ@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2011-07-28 16:27 ` Thomas Gleixner
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2011-07-28 16:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lars Segerlund; +Cc: linux-rt-users, LKML
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011, Lars Segerlund wrote:
> How much is there left to do for mainline inclusion ?
>
> A rough guess would be nice, just to assess the amount of work and severity.
http://dilbert.com/strips/comic/2010-06-26/
If that doesn't answer your question, then you might try:
# tar -xjf patches-3.0-rtx.tar.bz2
# ls patches/*.patch
# wc -l patches/*.patch
# for each patch in patches; do read $patch; done
> As I understand it , a lot of subsystes are trying to go lockless, so
> things should become easier.
Not really, they just use different mechanisms. Serialization and
synchronization are not restricted to locks and some of these
mechanisms are even more evil than a plain old lock.
Thanks,
tglx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2011-07-28 16:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <CAF-VNapwgfr66ib9OPcpJO-4K+6F-0VZA2Tc=4Fp==TDPKwkRQ@mail.gmail.com>
2011-07-28 16:27 ` [ANNOUNCE] 3.0-rt4 , Follow up question Thomas Gleixner
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox