The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>, "Dave Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, drivers_pci@kernel-bugs.osdl.org,
	"Rogério Brito" <rbrito@ime.usp.br>
Subject: Re: [Bug 41132] [BISECTED][REGRESSION] Regression with the IRQ subsystem introduced in 2.6.39 (and present in the 3.x version)
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 10:42:46 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1111301038560.2735@ionos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFzh-ST1-Hu+Ny25X5DkEqktv3ZDFP2NDOWx6N+vFbTM8A@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, 27 Nov 2011, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> Thomas, Ingo?
> 
> I haven't seen any response to this one, and while clearly commit
> fa27271bc8d2 ("genirq: Fixup poll handling") was *supposed* to be a
> no-op, it isn't.
> 
> The commit message says "Shorter version with the same
> functionality.", but since it causes a regression, it clearly is not
> with the same functionality at all. And I assume that Thomas doesn't
> have a machine that actually ever triggers the spurious irq issue to
> begin with, so it probably was never tested.
> 
> In short, it really sounds like this should just be reverted, since
> the code clearly doesn't do what the commit message claims it does.
> 
> Comments?

Yes, Edward tracked it down already. One part of the fix is already in
your tree commit 52553ddffad. The second half is in my queue.

See below. Thanks,

    tglx

------>
>From edward.donovan@numble.net Sun Nov 20 02:57:17 2011
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 20:54:23 -0500
From: Edward Donovan <edward.donovan@numble.net>
To: tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, maciej.rutecki@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH] genirq: fix second 2.6.39 regression in irqfixup, irqpoll

commit fa2727("genirq: Fixup poll handling") introduced a
regression that broke irqfixup/irqpoll for some hardware
configurations.  That patch removed a test that checked for
'action->handler' returning IRQ_HANDLED, before acting on the
IRQ.  Putting this test back restores the functionality lost
since 2.6.39.  In the current set of tests after 'action' is set,
it must precede '!action->next' to take effect.

With this and the previous patch to spurious.c, c75d720fca8a, all
IRQ regressions that I have encountered are fixed.

Signed-off-by: Edward Donovan <edward.donovan@numble.net>
---
 kernel/irq/spurious.c |    4 +++-
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/irq/spurious.c b/kernel/irq/spurious.c
index b5f4742..dc813a9 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/spurious.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/spurious.c
@@ -84,7 +84,9 @@ static int try_one_irq(int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, bool force)
 	 */
 	action = desc->action;
 	if (!action || !(action->flags & IRQF_SHARED) ||
-	    (action->flags & __IRQF_TIMER) || !action->next)
+	    (action->flags & __IRQF_TIMER) ||
+	    (action->handler(irq, action->dev_id) == IRQ_HANDLED) ||
+	    !action->next)
 		goto out;
 
 	/* Already running on another processor */
-- 
1.7.5.4



      parent reply	other threads:[~2011-11-30  9:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-41132-5003@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
     [not found] ` <201108160554.p7G5soeq002083@demeter2.kernel.org>
2011-11-22  8:10   ` [Bug 41132] [BISECTED][REGRESSION] Regression with the IRQ subsystem introduced in 2.6.39 (and present in the 3.x version) Rogério Brito
2011-11-27 20:22     ` Linus Torvalds
2011-11-28  3:46       ` Edward Donovan
2011-11-28  5:08         ` Rogério Brito
2011-11-28  4:07       ` [PATCH] genirq: fix second 2.6.39 regression in irqfixup, irqpoll Edward Donovan
2011-11-30  9:42       ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.02.1111301038560.2735@ionos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=drivers_pci@kernel-bugs.osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rbrito@ime.usp.br \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox