public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Peter Boonstoppel <pboonstoppel@nvidia.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
	Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <ibm-acpi@hmh.eng.br>,
	Andy Walls <awalls@md.metrocast.net>,
	Diwakar Tundlam <dtundlam@nvidia.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] kthread: disable preemption during complete()
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 09:14:22 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1208010913030.32033@ionos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5FBF8E85CA34454794F0F7ECBA79798F379D364860@HQMAIL04.nvidia.com>

On Thu, 26 Jul 2012, Peter Boonstoppel wrote:

> > > tglx has patches that make the kthread create/destroy stuff from hotplug
> > > go away.. that seems like the better approach.
> 
> > Right. That cpu hotplug setup/teardown stuff is ugly.
> 
> If that stuff gets removed complete that's great. The only change I'm aware of right now is the workqueue one: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1329164
> 
> > > The main thing is avoiding the wakeup preemption from the complete()
> > > because we're going to sleep right after anyway.
> 
> You are very likely to be preempted by the complete(), since the newly created thread has a relatively high vruntime.
> 
> > > The comment doesn't really make that clear.
> 
> > Right, the comment is crap. It has nothing to do with kthread_bind()
> > and stuff. The whole purpose is to avoid the pointless preemption
> > after wakeup.
> 
> The only case I want to solve is the kthread_bind()->wait_task_inactive() scenario. On our platforms this patch reduces average cpu_up() time from about 9ms to 8ms, but max time goes down from 37ms to 8.5ms. cpu_up() latency becomes much more predictable.
> 

There is a bunch of patches in the queue, which kills the full
setup/teardown of per cpu threads and puts those threads into a "park"
position instead.

Thanks,

	tglx

      reply	other threads:[~2012-08-01  7:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-25  0:05 [PATCH 1/1] kthread: disable preemption during complete() Peter Boonstoppel
2012-07-25  0:09 ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-25 22:35   ` Peter Boonstoppel
2012-07-25 22:40     ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-26  8:04       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-07-26 10:47         ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-07-26 15:54           ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-07-26 19:29             ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-07-26 21:16           ` Peter Boonstoppel
2012-08-01  7:14             ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.02.1208010913030.32033@ionos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=awalls@md.metrocast.net \
    --cc=dtundlam@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ibm-acpi@hmh.eng.br \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --cc=pboonstoppel@nvidia.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox