From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: "He, Bo" <bo.he@intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
"yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] hrtimer:__run_hrtimer races with enqueue_hrtimer
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 14:09:33 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1210261359210.2756@ionos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <144086DDB7BB6D429C79280EB1C804D41687C9@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On Fri, 26 Oct 2012, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> >From: Thomas Gleixner [mailto:tglx@linutronix.de]
> >Your code is returning HRTIMER_RESTART from the timer callback and at
> >the same time it starts the timer from some other context. That's what
> >needs to be fixed.
>
> The timer user should fix it. But could we also change hrtimer to
> make it more stable? At least, instead of panic, could we print
> some information and go ahead to let kernel continue?
That's unfortunately not possible. At this point the timer might be
already corrupted.
CPU0 CPU 1
timer expires
callback runs
hrtimer_start()
expiry value is set
hrtimer_enqueue()
hrtimer_forward()
expiry value is set
return HRTIMER_RESTART
So while we can prevent the double enqueue, we have no way to deal
with the corrupted expiry value and the inconsistent RB tree. We can
give better debugging information, but we can't pretend that
everything is nice and cool.
If we really want to do something about it which keeps the machine
alive, then we need to
1) dequeue the timer
2) run a consistency check over the rbtree
3) enqueue the timer
Not sure if that's worth the trouble.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-26 12:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-26 2:51 [PATCH] hrtimer:__run_hrtimer races with enqueue_hrtimer he, bo
2012-10-26 8:51 ` Yanmin Zhang
2012-10-26 9:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-10-26 11:38 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2012-10-26 12:09 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2012-10-29 0:58 ` Yanmin Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.02.1210261359210.2756@ionos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=bo.he@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=yanmin.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox