linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] staging: lustre: lmv: add missing function declaration
@ 2016-09-18 11:39 Baoyou Xie
  2016-09-18 19:43 ` James Simmons
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Baoyou Xie @ 2016-09-18 11:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: oleg.drokin, andreas.dilger, jsimmons, gregkh, di.wang,
	john.hammond, fan.yong
  Cc: lustre-devel, devel, linux-kernel, arnd, baoyou.xie, xie.baoyou

We get 1 warning when building kernel with W=1:
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lmv/lmv_obd.c:2774:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'lmv_pack_md' [-Wmissing-prototypes]

In fact, this function is not declared in any file,but should be
declared in a header file, thus can be recognized in other file.

So this patch adds the declarations into
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_lmv.h.

Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_lmv.h | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_lmv.h b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_lmv.h
index 085e596..21302c7 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_lmv.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_lmv.h
@@ -119,3 +119,5 @@ static inline void lmv_le_to_cpu(union lmv_mds_md *lmv_dst,
 }

+int lmv_pack_md(union lmv_mds_md **lmmp, const struct lmv_stripe_md *lsm,
+		int stripe_count);
 #endif
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: lmv: add missing function declaration
  2016-09-18 11:39 [PATCH] staging: lustre: lmv: add missing function declaration Baoyou Xie
@ 2016-09-18 19:43 ` James Simmons
  2016-09-18 20:35   ` Arnd Bergmann
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: James Simmons @ 2016-09-18 19:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Baoyou Xie
  Cc: oleg.drokin, andreas.dilger, gregkh, di.wang, john.hammond,
	fan.yong, lustre-devel, devel, linux-kernel, arnd, xie.baoyou


> We get 1 warning when building kernel with W=1:
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lmv/lmv_obd.c:2774:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'lmv_pack_md' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> 
> In fact, this function is not declared in any file,but should be
> declared in a header file, thus can be recognized in other file.
> 
> So this patch adds the declarations into
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_lmv.h.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_lmv.h | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

Nak. I'm not seeing this error with W=1. Also if you look
lmv_pack_md() is only used in lmv_obd.c and the function
appears early in the file before it is used, so no prototype
missing errors should happen. 
 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_lmv.h b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_lmv.h
> index 085e596..21302c7 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_lmv.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_lmv.h
> @@ -119,3 +119,5 @@ static inline void lmv_le_to_cpu(union lmv_mds_md *lmv_dst,
>  }
> 
> +int lmv_pack_md(union lmv_mds_md **lmmp, const struct lmv_stripe_md *lsm,
> +		int stripe_count);
>  #endif
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: lmv: add missing function declaration
  2016-09-18 19:43 ` James Simmons
@ 2016-09-18 20:35   ` Arnd Bergmann
  2016-09-18 20:53     ` James Simmons
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2016-09-18 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: James Simmons
  Cc: Baoyou Xie, oleg.drokin, andreas.dilger, gregkh, di.wang,
	john.hammond, fan.yong, lustre-devel, devel, linux-kernel,
	xie.baoyou

On Sunday, September 18, 2016 8:43:18 PM CEST James Simmons wrote:
> 
> Nak. I'm not seeing this error with W=1. Also if you look
> lmv_pack_md() is only used in lmv_obd.c and the function
> appears early in the file before it is used, so no prototype
> missing errors should happen. 

So it should be marked "static" and the EXPORT_SYMBOL() removed,
right?

	Arnd

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: lmv: add missing function declaration
  2016-09-18 20:35   ` Arnd Bergmann
@ 2016-09-18 20:53     ` James Simmons
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: James Simmons @ 2016-09-18 20:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnd Bergmann
  Cc: Baoyou Xie, oleg.drokin, andreas.dilger, gregkh, di.wang,
	john.hammond, fan.yong, lustre-devel, devel, linux-kernel,
	xie.baoyou


> On Sunday, September 18, 2016 8:43:18 PM CEST James Simmons wrote:
> > 
> > Nak. I'm not seeing this error with W=1. Also if you look
> > lmv_pack_md() is only used in lmv_obd.c and the function
> > appears early in the file before it is used, so no prototype
> > missing errors should happen. 
> 
> So it should be marked "static" and the EXPORT_SYMBOL() removed,
> right?

Already done. See patch

[PATCH 109/124] staging: lustre: misc: remove unnecessary EXPORT_SYMBOL

which is from Frank Zago which I just pushed to Greg.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-09-18 21:02 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-09-18 11:39 [PATCH] staging: lustre: lmv: add missing function declaration Baoyou Xie
2016-09-18 19:43 ` James Simmons
2016-09-18 20:35   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-09-18 20:53     ` James Simmons

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).