From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932441AbdJZTVG (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Oct 2017 15:21:06 -0400 Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:19708 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932326AbdJZTVE (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Oct 2017 15:21:04 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 21:20:47 +0200 (CEST) From: James Morris X-X-Sender: james.l.morris@localhost To: David Howells cc: jmorris@namei.org, gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, mjg59@google.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jforbes@redhat.com, linux-man@vger.kernel.org, jlee@suse.com, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Kernel lockdown for secure boot In-Reply-To: <29447.1509035858@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Message-ID: References: <29447.1509035858@warthog.procyon.org.uk> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (LFD 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Source-IP: aserv0022.oracle.com [141.146.126.234] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 26 Oct 2017, David Howells wrote: > Hi James, > > Can you pull this patchset into security/next please? > > It adds kernel lockdown support for EFI secure boot. Note that it doesn't yet > cover: > > bpf - No agreement as to how > ftrace - Recently suggested, query sent to maintainer > perf - Not looked at yet. How useful is this really if it's incomplete? And I think it really needs more testing in -next. -- James Morris