From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753021Ab2GXFjq (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jul 2012 01:39:46 -0400 Received: from mail.bmail.ru ([194.67.1.203]:30487 "EHLO sovam.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751378Ab2GXFjo (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jul 2012 01:39:44 -0400 X-SPIN-Class: auth_users X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent X-DSPAM-Processed: Tue Jul 24 09:39:41 2012 X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.9899 X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0000 Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 09:39:40 +0400 (MSK) From: kyak X-X-Sender: bas@bas To: David Miller cc: bas@bmail.ru, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sshtylyov@mvista.com, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, greg@kroah.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: plusb: Add support for PL-2501 In-Reply-To: <20120723.130835.1217772163295796220.davem@davemloft.net> Message-ID: References: <20120723.130835.1217772163295796220.davem@davemloft.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (LNX 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This patch was created against linux-3.5, but it applies perfectly against net-next tree, i just checked.. I'm sorry for not being able to submit the correct patch from the first attempt (and not even from the third attempt). Could you be more specific about "doesn't apply cleanly at all"? By the way, i'm perfectly fine if you just make this trivial change by yourself and take the credit, because our exchange of e-mails has become 20 times bigger than the patch itself. Probably sending another version of this patch from my side would be just another waste of (your) time. On Mon, 23 Jul 2012, David Miller wrote: > From: kyak > Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 15:44:11 +0400 (MSK) > >> From: Mikhail Peselnik >> >> This patch adds support for PL-2501 by adding the appropriate USB >> ID's. This chip is used in several USB 'Easy Trasfer' Cables. >> >> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Peselnik >> Tested-by: Mikhail Peselnik > > This does not apply cleanly to my net-next tree at all. >