The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nubus: Unconditionally register bus type
Date: Mon, 7 May 2018 09:57:22 +1000 (AEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.21.1805070930240.8@nippy.intranet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180506202018.GC8924@kroah.com>

On Sun, 6 May 2018, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:

> > > Why not just have an "bus is registered" flag in your driver 
> > > register function that refuses to let drivers register with the 
> > > driver core if it isn't set?
> > 
> > Perhaps that should happen in the core driver_register() function. 
> > BUG_ON is frowned upon, after all. Would that be acceptable?
> 
> I don't understand what you mean here, perhaps make a patch to show it?
> 

As an alternative to your suggestion (add flag to avoid the BUG_ON):

--- a/drivers/base/driver.c
+++ b/drivers/base/driver.c
@@ -148,7 +148,10 @@ int driver_register(struct device_driver *drv)
 	int ret;
 	struct device_driver *other;
 
-	BUG_ON(!drv->bus->p);
+	if (!drv->bus->p) {
+		WARN_ONCE(1, "Cannot register driver with invalid bus\n");
+		return -EPROBE_DEFER;
+	}
 
 	if ((drv->bus->probe && drv->probe) ||
 	    (drv->bus->remove && drv->remove) ||

I'm not actually proposing this change; just responding to your question.

For the bug at hand, I still prefer the patch at the beginning of this 
thread, because it seems to follow the conventional pattern.

> > I found a few drivers that set a flag the way you describe, which 
> > could then be simplified.
> > 
> > But that pattern is rare. Most buses use the postcore_initcall() 
> > pattern, and so my patch took the conventional approach.
> 
> It all depends on link order, not necessarily the postcore stuff.
> 
> > > And then fix your linking error, the bus should come first in link 
> > > order, before your drivers :)
> > > 
> > 
> > I didn't encounter any errors. How shall I reproduce this?
> 
> If you have not seen this error, then why change the code at all if it 
> is working properly?

I never saw the link error you mentioned.

Please see this thread for one example of how to hit the BUG_ON.
https://marc.info/?l=linux-m68k&m=152522162801182&w=2

Another way to trigger the BUG_ON is to set,
CONFIG_ATARI=y
CONFIG_MAC=y
CONFIG_NUBUS=y
CONFIG_MAC8390=y
and try to boot the result on aranym.

-- 

> Most busses do not need this as they have their link order set up 
> correctly, no need to mess with stuff that is not broken :)
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-05-06 23:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-06  1:47 [PATCH] nubus: Unconditionally register bus type Finn Thain
2018-05-06  4:55 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-05-06  6:00   ` Finn Thain
2018-05-06 20:20     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-05-06 21:51       ` Michael Schmitz
2018-05-08  7:00         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-05-08  7:07           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-05-08  7:25             ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-05-08  7:35               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-05-08  7:41                 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-05-08  8:01               ` Michael Schmitz
2018-05-06 23:57       ` Finn Thain [this message]
2018-05-07 12:53         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-05-07 14:45           ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-05-08  6:28             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-05-07 23:44         ` Finn Thain
2018-05-08  6:32           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-05-08  7:59             ` Finn Thain
2018-05-08  7:01         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
     [not found] <5aee5ede.1c69fb81.353b4.5021SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com>
2018-05-08  7:39 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-05-08  8:27   ` Finn Thain
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-05-06  1:47 Finn Thain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LNX.2.21.1805070930240.8@nippy.intranet \
    --to=fthain@telegraphics.com.au \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox