From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CCFAC4360F for ; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 08:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54592217D7 for ; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 08:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730283AbfDEIdq (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Apr 2019 04:33:46 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:56856 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729785AbfDEIdp (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Apr 2019 04:33:45 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 352DBAF47; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 08:33:44 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 10:33:43 +0200 (CEST) From: Miroslav Benes To: Josh Poimboeuf cc: yamada.masahiro@socionext.com, michal.lkml@markovi.net, pmladek@suse.com, jikos@kernel.org, joe.lawrence@redhat.com, ggherdovich@suse.cz, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kbuild: use -flive-patching when CONFIG_LIVEPATCH is enabled In-Reply-To: <20190404201855.xtvtgxaaomcmowrt@treble> Message-ID: References: <20190404184411.1392-1-mbenes@suse.cz> <20190404201855.xtvtgxaaomcmowrt@treble> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LSU 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > While we're on the subject, I'm glad to see ongoing activity on > klp-convert (though I haven't had a chance to follow the discussions). > What's the status of the rest of the needed bits? > > - kgraft-analysis-tool - will this also be submitted for inclusion in > the kernel tree? Yes, it is the next step. > - Documentation about how to create a patch I know we talked about it, but I don't remember what we came up with. We should probably tie to Nicolai's work. It will change the process a lot. > - The other bits I think Nicolai has been working on to eliminate all > the manual steps Miroslav