From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758236Ab0DPDWG (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Apr 2010 23:22:06 -0400 Received: from www.telegraphics.com.au ([204.15.192.19]:37523 "EHLO mail.telegraphics.com.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757423Ab0DPDWE (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Apr 2010 23:22:04 -0400 Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 13:21:52 +1000 (EST) From: Finn Thain To: Joe Perches cc: "David S. Miller" , Paul Gortmaker , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux/m68k Subject: Re: another cleanup patch gone wrong In-Reply-To: <1271387506.2298.17.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> Message-ID: References: <1271387506.2298.17.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (OSX 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 15 Apr 2010, Joe Perches wrote: > > Why the macro? You only used it once. > > It's used embedded in the pr_ functions. > It's used more than once. > > > The pr_xxx naming convention belongs to a kernel-wide include file. Is it > > really a good idea to start repurposing it in .c files? > > It's in kernel.h, and yes, it is. > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/11/12/297 My mistake. Finn