From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB9AC3D890E for ; Sat, 18 Jul 2026 15:23:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784388218; cv=none; b=gGhysQf9Hke2BvN90s12GpTkNwVZDJEPO/b4EJFfnvQSdDbWtxOTVPTcNi6ptTJcEp/ZadEduWx+D+ixBaNeGdHfgl/8Zj24d+z/nqH/ErW73FCkiK1BgLKvnzaWIU19MnQ4EtGXwri6Q6TgZq21sxp+Q1kHYeO32YCvMW5AoyU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784388218; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BxOc+P2cYz1TULPiWVbhGaT/Tfs/xqhjzztbQD5tN+k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=kf6SK7ksTX72FNDBvfjmuKCPGgn69Be4c68OXLVyp8wzrDIewx05hhNv8O5IkgI5w7CZJlnVg8PKD2Xey/aUxXVA5s98ZgQFj1W+pRVi+uMxTcMdYFqqh/Osm5YWxonVCzQdV6JkY2WOV+vUdcnxfs8NnpTAn0XrG5cMrTnhw38= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=AsQI/e++; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="AsQI/e++" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1784388211; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xAGhW0qGGS6bImxALSIlIu+AR7DBr6ToCi1mFcVfN94=; b=AsQI/e++/t/JNkJ1GgAHOtiPy0br/fJVrjSbh06SvJUtGzK3ClaTWOFhf+FljIfXiMwDUr eIhp6H+Q6+Ok3GjkXitqLbdBLVVvJYRbVip65XsyNlEsXI8KuOzn4D6PVF8zdhHHyhKXUC O24IxW3helC7XolVjlLbXfmK42Q3jfE= Received: from mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-297-cJjFiycHPOSw4TwFrGvGcA-1; Sat, 18 Jul 2026 11:23:27 -0400 X-MC-Unique: cJjFiycHPOSw4TwFrGvGcA-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: cJjFiycHPOSw4TwFrGvGcA_1784388206 Received: from mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.17]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BECE1955D8E; Sat, 18 Jul 2026 15:23:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fedora (unknown [10.44.49.164]) by mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0F8571954221; Sat, 18 Jul 2026 15:23:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fedora (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1000 oleg@redhat.com; Sat, 18 Jul 2026 17:23:25 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2026 17:23:22 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Thomas Bogendoerfer Cc: James Hogan , Kees Cook , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: ptrace: Fix syscall skipping via PTRACE_SYSCALL Message-ID: References: <20260717112731.59254-1-tsbogend@alpha.franken.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260717112731.59254-1-tsbogend@alpha.franken.de> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.17 I obviously can't ack the mips-specific change, but it looks good to me. Thomas, thanks again. Oleg. On 07/17, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote: > > If tracer wanted to skip a syscall return value was always > overwritten with -ENOSYS. Fix this by checking against original > syscall number and only return -ENOSYS, if it is negative. > > Fixes: b6318a903d06 ("MIPS/ptrace: Pick up ptrace/seccomp changed syscalls") > Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer > --- > arch/mips/kernel/ptrace.c | 6 +++++- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/mips/kernel/ptrace.c > index 3f4c94c88124..87102a03b6ea 100644 > --- a/arch/mips/kernel/ptrace.c > +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/ptrace.c > @@ -1321,8 +1321,12 @@ long arch_ptrace(struct task_struct *child, long request, > */ > asmlinkage long syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs) > { > + long syscall; > + > user_exit(); > > + syscall = current_thread_info()->syscall; > + > if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE)) { > if (ptrace_report_syscall_entry(regs)) > return -1; > @@ -1342,7 +1346,7 @@ asmlinkage long syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs) > * Negative syscall numbers are mistaken for rejected syscalls, but > * won't have had the return value set appropriately, so we do so now. > */ > - if (current_thread_info()->syscall < 0) > + if (syscall < 0) > syscall_set_return_value(current, regs, -ENOSYS, 0); > return current_thread_info()->syscall; > } > -- > 2.51.0 >