From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-184.mta0.migadu.com (out-184.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.184]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E11683246EC for ; Sat, 1 Aug 2026 16:26:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.184 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785601603; cv=none; b=dJ3qmjNWDjMLUJBA+W/7SMX9W5PlTpkQjYnAMif2hw41TUAbd9+sn5QwRQGKhHuu4fkrc7FMlj/IzShxlYiBEslV3c5hEZlEVAToiPe37YwmM2THzL/d1oGG6vRfouh4KLfl1gkOlE+fYWnI411ymBbaS2afIc81uWZ3mm0Vv2A= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785601603; c=relaxed/simple; bh=A+5PxE2iM2FV+MATdZ+dLGNprVDby/PmbTEozVSCeRM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=qRjhxbylAC6VwFC2hY/T+FUykT5hUldnTCji7mf2JSf2HWHosMdWyi4b/SM8DmPU4UXhpsLMCWI8aUST2RG8X1Ok5mEw8tpgBNrY9SwIF1HygnWNl3lbrBZcd2UxUAsslHsbbl8KhpYWE8jU1C1tDjGeKN0x8aZf549FWCKijfk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=wyuan.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wyuan.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=wyuan.org header.i=@wyuan.org header.b=ZAymfnuc; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.184 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=wyuan.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wyuan.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=wyuan.org header.i=@wyuan.org header.b="ZAymfnuc" Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2026 00:26:15 +0800 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wyuan.org; s=key1; t=1785601589; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=p4gW9+hKioOTTiRLvl6Dh8Bzq/fMTk8rVpXQUdVj9Sk=; b=ZAymfnucHDV2/6h8Nw1a9PX/c65S/TBwy4ZZ6E3Zq1ewLCgBnAEFLpL40iwi4bAhY8zXHZ b1F4nnpRK5yh0jZkmsuZr3RGwbMLTLBd7Mn3xP0delVRkqAaVQ0VjwunmqZLmAU2Cs8KcD af4KDmiZfMM/X3CMNxgLUjot9ZOdtT3enZFkRixeUhBOcIMjSc1ji5fwWXphWo1oZyu7Lc FzvCuWOVtGKvuumYOZJLksLTXGl6t2uTwWCLONZjfp7gLKXPlewPJi8TXr918Bv5ZqjbM/ afXW9bjA5G7TNik6PqJgJPPxHFPVB9CR2fxSdgTuEFRGkYZDlu+hnq2tlqBhfQ== X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Weijie Yuan To: =?utf-8?B?6JGJ5a645L2R?= Cc: Jonathan Corbet , Alex Shi , Dongliang Mu , Yanteng Si , Hu Haowen <2023002089@link.tyut.edu.cn>, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/16] docs/zh_TW: process: localize terminology in code-of-conduct-interpretation.rst Message-ID: References: <20260728091038.171033-1-chenyou910331@gmail.com> <20260728091038.171033-4-chenyou910331@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT On Fri, Jul 31, 2026 at 01:19:58PM +0800, 葉宸佑 wrote: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 12:45:25AM +0800, Weijie Yuan wrote: > > If the following comments are due to my overthinking, then > > > > Acked-by: Weijie Yuan > > Not overthinking at all -- two of the three are real improvements. > Thanks for the Acked-by, I will carry it over. > > > > +當個人在違規發生的場合承認自己的行為並作出彌補時 > > > > In zh_CN, I think we prefer '纠正' (纠正行为). Just a reference. > > You are right, and this is not a cross-strait difference. 彌補 in > Taiwanese usage takes a loss or a shortfall as its object (彌補損失, > 彌補不足), so 彌補行為 reads oddly. The English is "makes amends", > i.e. corrects the behaviour, so 糾正 is the right word here and is > equally natural in Taiwan. Will change to: > > 當個人在違規發生的場合承認自己的行為並加以糾正時 Nice. Thanks. > > > +行為準則委員會有責任與所有相關方合作，調查並解決這些報告。 > > > > 处理报告 or 解决报告？I don't know Taiwan's preference. > > I would do this in zh_CN: > > 行为准则委员会有责任与所有相关方合作，对这类报告进行调查并予以处理。 > > Also right, and again not a regional difference -- 解決 takes a > problem as its object, not a report, so 解決報告 is simply wrong in > both variants. Taiwan says 處理報告 / 處理申訴. I will follow your > sentence structure: > > 行為準則委員會有責任與所有相關方合作，對這類報告進行調查並予以處理。 > > > > +行為準則委員會衷心希望，需要要求公開道歉的不可接受行為，在未來仍然極為罕見。 > > > > 行为准则委员会衷心希望，那些需要公开道歉的不可接受行为在未来能继续成为极为 > > 罕见的现象。 > > > > .. seems more clear and coherent? > > This one I would rather keep as is, if you do not mind. Both are > understandable, so this is a style call rather than a > correctness one. Agreed that this is just style call, so doesn't make much sense. I'm definitely fine with your decision. Thanks!