From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.zeus03.de (zeus03.de [194.117.254.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FA6C36F415 for ; Sat, 1 Aug 2026 21:02:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785618160; cv=none; b=d+lzMcdTxzXB/0XJUqaGiDdYFcosDEOCil+E7fygtNMJWf8jBveULcptoZg4kyrH7lxYeCifD5tSU/7eMfkKQDOTzXH0V/lDe/BEL+Dkn4pzcLnWOMTeEqNGOT4FJFechf8tO88A8vB9gjysFBm65/5ky0HW/OCbpxLCEM6Mmog= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785618160; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xwwA1YvI/X4mutqLIpkbuE4ICC1y+3Y/dUHwcE6ZnCE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=OtIIYrgoiUryIfCzwJWgCWsCz7qGrBm9Yg4aXHDBJLRHTX9ddJTbDHq9w41m2VeKpu109LPL70XUWtsWXs+bICzVoJ5dMZ032HjuL+lrLmmDhLy0TMtSlS9jFq6EeWdQ53PjNK9kxab1szXTKxpodEQ83QJ3ECgwAkKqfghdhos= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b=KBLDwAHD; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b="KBLDwAHD" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= sang-engineering.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=xwwA 1YvI/X4mutqLIpkbuE4ICC1y+3Y/dUHwcE6ZnCE=; b=KBLDwAHDAvlkUu959dME HJu9Dl3iBTtLVwOtuIhXPCm8v9sLSxb0DCCU0bGHJcaiik85fUyaBxR4x3itu1y2 9vWPpfWg+Y9+TukkJYrMjJEnwK1dFsOq8MdpBLodVOZwLJ+ABHzcp0NSjtMEm1bj aP0A8RQqcDQl9fG9c/32jvc+KzQB/Mc4DcC0xxsf6yhLtvImPucV8in+5YaC3fGW Ug29mZwro0Iyvl5Su7mn6KzTJOwJNM4pK1USNtBajB3RM5PhwveT0im6ckLMrcku pTDn5BNGB4vVbEwWaMVyVN8cCYI2z72/p2/UskRiFB0hrO7lxwWP6JPnqsVOJBBH eA== Received: (qmail 2496436 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2026 23:02:36 +0200 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with ESMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 1 Aug 2026 23:02:36 +0200 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@TZ7lnwJYKKwujnt8 Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2026 23:02:35 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Aniket RANDIVE Cc: Mukesh Savaliya , Andi Shyti , Viken Dadhaniya , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] i2c: core: Add i2c_update_timeout() helper for dynamic transfer timeouts Message-ID: References: <20260720-master-v6-1-671261b05c61@oss.qualcomm.com> <0c0d1406-949b-49ee-b203-3833b9f8433b@oss.qualcomm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1qJfCwis4bv+clGb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: --1qJfCwis4bv+clGb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 10:23:46PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: >=20 > > Given the feedback so far, would maintainers prefer that if i drop the = core > > helper entirely and keep the dynamic timeout calculation local to the > > qcom-geni driver or should we continue exploring an opt-in core-based > > approach? >=20 > Well, I suggested a potential way in my last mail (Kconfig option). So, > what do you think about it? Does it handle your use case? Another bit which may be important for you: there is currently a patch set under discussion [1] to allow changing bus speeds dynamically. You probably want to base your work on top of it and/or help getting it discussed? Happy hacking! [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260719-i2c-mux-v12-0-a5010d623a57@gmail.c= om/ --1qJfCwis4bv+clGb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmpuXusACgkQFA3kzBSg Kbbq6hAAoYOvUh7GIllIPMFO4jAtyc0tuw1DDAPrJxsovz3cOGtm03SVzXLiQ2QM Eysn/mQmoczzYnkEpX7UQAYyJBTUVn4IBSCrrQkximE84QnfsRdOnsZRD6R1s8w/ /WcG8nBPWyHlqNcvZDOrKyk+LIRA8WtD2sr5/Fqvnb/92H2XTeHxfoK/YA4xHROT qCugmqdH0LIU5i5Ys1LZ4rYsi57yqCa4dHC8NZnT/SeSKy3xQlSKiaOWbx435HBE bpKNrokG9oOQU8HKWVQCZA+0xbqBfk/iC4zMg8IhjDikfjuCb7ydxbQAjbuTkm10 Db+3FEGgHDjPmG52M1lfSeEiLCSMGrWYR4ktYLriJeF0irk49GSwdbKBHZJMWAM3 pYKwoNIMy50Xfa5hJywCeD4tuowDpMQRQDyj0KraabOMhGJdClpI6II3ZiNvbKz4 HrK3IsIFt6ywU/K7oUcZaUTcVkztpkLS4uQ/8k5duI9js3P2s6Lnno8PblNLN3zu q/266a2Bk40eTbRFzIaGrTTFtgPWjxMruOmAfNg2+JNLB0TE287WbJjLybTV/YbW s1QYJGE5HYq6puYVLnpZ0cdXwsUZ4t9IOuFLN1IjF8loLOIBUrGRN9H5CJwFWAFN /H+naDrdeJaF546jJ6eS2tUDFiDfgiTR2794FI2Hzyq0XXnQNS0= =ToTX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1qJfCwis4bv+clGb--