The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] pipe: only enable the extra wake_up(rd_wait) when epoll is actually used
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2026 17:10:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <amIu5WWgTNkdvqIz@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <amIqfCo25rLtM2U0@redhat.com>

OK, sashiko has some concerns

	https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/amIqmbbZx3NlzUsX%40redhat.com

As for READ_ONCE(), I agree, I just forgot to add them.

But so far I don't understand the note about io_uring...
I'll try to check later.

Anyway, I'd like to know your opinion.

On 07/23, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> Breno, Christian, Mateusz,
>
> To be honest, I am not sure this change makes a lot of sense.
> But somehow the extra wakeup in anon_pipe_write() looks annoying to me.
>
> Can you take a look?
>
> Plus I'd like to know what sashiko.dev thinks.
>
> I have no idea how to test it wrt performance...
>
> Oleg.
> ---
>
>  fs/pipe.c                 | 23 +++++++++++++++++++----
>  include/linux/pipe_fs_i.h |  6 ++++--
>  2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)


      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-23 15:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-23 14:51 [PATCH 0/1] pipe: only enable the extra wake_up(rd_wait) when epoll is actually used Oleg Nesterov
2026-07-23 14:52 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2026-07-23 16:41   ` Mateusz Guzik
2026-07-23 15:10 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=amIu5WWgTNkdvqIz@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjguzik@gmail.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox