Re: [PATCH v2] mac80211: reject station addition if AP or MLO link is inactive

[Slawomir Stepien <sst@poczta.fm>]

On lip 27, 2026 11:25, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Mon, 2026-07-27 at 11:22 +0200, Slawomir Stepien wrote:
> > 
> > I think we do not have. I'm looking at the struct wireless_dev fields and I see that there is just
> > info about what the configuration should be, not info about what is the current state of the device.
> > I also do not see any callback in struct cfg80211_ops that might help to get such info. If I'm wrong
> > then please correct my observation!
> 
> I think we maintain wdev->links[].ap.beacon_interval?

Ah: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.1.4/source/net/wireless/nl80211.c#L7188 and
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.1.4/source/net/wireless/ap.c#L36. Ok! Let me try using that in
v3 then. Thanks!

> > Beside this, do we think that all devices would always need this rejection? What if firmware of
> > these devices would benefit from *lack* of such rejection? Just thinking aloud, not that I know such
> > devices.
> 
> I don't think it should be legal in the userspace API, and even if they
> did, we'd have to add a flag to let hostapd know about it, and then when
> (probably never) we did that, we could change the checks along with the
> API.

Sure. If you think it should be like that I can agree, since I do not have any opinion here.

-- 
Slawomir Stepien