Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: clock: airoha: Add PHY binding for Serdes port

[Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>]

On Mon, Jul 27, 2026 at 10:09:17PM +0200, Christian Marangi wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2026 at 04:05:43PM -0400, Brian Masney wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 08:43:01PM +0200, Christian Marangi wrote:
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/airoha,en7523-scu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/airoha,en7523-scu.yaml
> > > index eb24a5687639..fc37786ac7ed 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/airoha,en7523-scu.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/airoha,en7523-scu.yaml
> > > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ description: |
> > >  
> > >    All these identifiers can be found in:
> > >    [1]: <include/dt-bindings/clock/en7523-clk.h>.
> > > +  [2]: <include/dt-bindings/soc/airoha,scu-ssr.h>.
> > >  
> > >    The clocks are provided inside a system controller node.
> > >  
> > > @@ -50,6 +51,12 @@ properties:
> > >      description: ID of the controller reset line
> > >      const: 1
> > >  
> > > +  '#phy-cells':
> > > +    description:
> > > +      The first cell indicates the serdes phy number, see [2] for the
> > > +      available serdes port.
> > > +    const: 1
> > > +
> > >  required:
> > >    - compatible
> > >    - reg
> > > @@ -65,12 +72,23 @@ allOf:
> > >          reg:
> > >            minItems: 2
> > >  
> > > +        '#phy-cells': false
> > > +
> > > +  - if:
> > > +      properties:
> > > +        compatible:
> > > +          const: econet,en751221-scu
> > > +    then:
> > > +      properties:
> > > +        reg:
> > > +          maxItems: 1
> > > +
> > > +        '#phy-cells': false
> > > +
> > >    - if:
> > >        properties:
> > >          compatible:
> > > -          enum:
> > > -            - airoha,en7581-scu
> > > -            - econet,en751221-scu
> > > +          const: airoha,en7581-scu
> > >      then:
> > >        properties:
> > >          reg:
> > 
> > This chunk is new since the split out v10 series[1]. I see that you dropped
> > krzk's Reviewed-by presumably because of the new chunk. However I don't
> > see a changelog.
> > 
> > I'm collecting patches up for a clk pull to Stephen. (I'm not sure if
> > he's going to pull but I'm going to try.) I'm not going to include this
> > series until I see a Reviewed-by by one of the dt maintainers on the new
> > patch.
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260702093812.15918-2-ansuelsmth@gmail.com/
> >
> 
> Hi Brian,
> 
> yes all correct. I dropped as the patch changed (change is trivial but not
> correct)

But not correct? Do you need to post a new version of this series?

If this version is correct, then I suggest including a changelog here
for krzk.

Brian