From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the liveupdate tree with the mm-unstable tree
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 09:06:57 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ammYgVd3Ty8JE0Fd@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260728134333.906cb26da4b6dec083b21344@linux-foundation.org>
On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 01:43:33PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jul 2026 20:38:54 +0300 Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > I've got this for merging mm-unstable into liveupdate/next:
> >
> > diff --cc mm/hugetlb.c
> > index ab4afc818e8cb,a77c3c1cb8943..0000000000000
> > --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> > +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
>
> Well that's a pain.
Once resolved it stops being a pain :)
> I'll get the series "mm: Refactor bootmem gigantic
> hugepage allocation" into mm-stable in the next couple of days. Can we
> then make this issue go away?
I can base the conflicting KHO work on mm-stable.
But if mm-stable is rebased we'd be in a bigger trouble.
Ideally we'd have a stable branch in mm tree that only contains "mm:
Refactor bootmem gigantic hugepage allocation" series and then this branch
would be easily merged into mm-stable and into liveupdate tree.
I'm going to keep liveupdate tree as it is for a couple of days and when
Pratyush sends the updated version we can resync again.
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-29 6:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-28 16:27 linux-next: manual merge of the liveupdate tree with the mm-unstable tree Mark Brown
2026-07-28 17:38 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-28 17:56 ` Mark Brown
2026-07-28 20:43 ` Andrew Morton
2026-07-29 6:06 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2026-07-29 7:10 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ammYgVd3Ty8JE0Fd@kernel.org \
--to=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox