The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	 kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com,
	 przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
	saeedm@nvidia.com, tariqt@nvidia.com,  mbloch@nvidia.com,
	ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, hawk@kernel.org,
	 john.fastabend@gmail.com, sdf@fomichev.me,
	maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com,  mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com,
	alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com, aleksander.lobakin@intel.com,
	 horms@kernel.org, magnus.karlsson@intel.com, witu@nvidia.com,
	 alice.kernel@fastmail.im, dtatulea@nvidia.com,
	yoong.siang.song@intel.com,  martin.lau@kernel.org,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	 linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, leon@kernel.org,
	AutonomousCodeSecurity@microsoft.com,
	 "Cen Zhang (Microsoft)" <blbllhy@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/6] xsk: harden TX metadata validation against races
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 09:08:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <amolBkuwEasuthzu@devvm7509.cco0.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <amnKVlHTITILY8H8@boxer>

On 07/29, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2026 at 09:19:53AM -0700, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > Cen Zhang reported a KASAN out-of-bounds read when AF_XDP is configured
> > with a TX metadata area smaller than struct xsk_tx_metadata. The metadata
> > is also shared with user space, so reading its flags more than once can
> > produce inconsistent validation and processing decisions.
> > 
> > Require enough space for the flags and one request field, validate the
> > launch-time field against the configured metadata length, and use one
> > snapshot of the flags while processing each request. Carry the validated
> > decision through completion handling so later user-space changes cannot
> > enable an unrequested completion timestamp.
> 
> Stan,
> 
> I'm taking week off and I see one sashiko-reported issue which is not a
> pre-existing one. Hope you could clarify it and unless no one picks the
> review of this set i'll get back at it next week.

Went through the issues, I don't think it found anything interesting.
Everything is pre-existing, but still worth addressing, will send
those fixes separately.

> >  static inline struct xsk_tx_metadata *
> >  __xsk_buff_get_metadata(const struct xsk_buff_pool *pool, void *data)
> >  {
> >  	struct xsk_tx_metadata *meta;
> > +	u64 flags;
> >  
> >  	if (!pool->tx_metadata_len)
> >  		return NULL;
> >  
> >  	meta = data - pool->tx_metadata_len;
> > -	if (unlikely(!xsk_buff_valid_tx_metadata(meta)))
> > +	if (unlikely(!xsk_buff_valid_tx_metadata(pool, meta, &flags)))
> >  		return NULL; /* no way to signal the error to the user */
> >  
> >  	return meta;
> The snapshotted flags are validated for size compliance in
> xsk_buff_valid_tx_metadata() but then discarded, returning the
> un-snapshotted user memory pointer (meta) to the driver.
> Later in the zero-copy driver path, xsk_tx_metadata_request() re-reads
> meta->flags directly from user memory:
> include/net/xdp_sock.h:xsk_tx_metadata_request() {
>     ...
>     if (meta->flags & XDP_TXMD_FLAGS_LAUNCH_TIME)
>         ops->tmo_request_launch_time(meta->request.launch_time, priv);
>     ...
> }
> Does this create a Time-of-Check to Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) race condition in
> the zero-copy TX metadata validation where userspace can concurrently enable
> launch time after the size validation?

For this, yes, it is explained in the commit message:

  Note that only xsk_skb_metadata is properly using the flags,
  __xsk_buff_get_metadata ignores them. Next commits address that.

And eventually addressed in "[PATCH net 6/6] xsk: validate metadata when
processing requests". Couldn't find a less confusing way to split the
patches..

      reply	other threads:[~2026-07-29 16:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-27 16:19 [PATCH net 0/6] xsk: harden TX metadata validation against races Stanislav Fomichev
2026-07-27 16:19 ` [PATCH net 1/6] xsk: require at least 16 bytes of TX metadata Stanislav Fomichev
2026-07-27 16:19 ` [PATCH net 2/6] xsk: pass TX metadata pointer by reference Stanislav Fomichev
2026-07-27 16:19 ` [PATCH net 3/6] xsk: clear metadata pointer when no timestamp is requested Stanislav Fomichev
2026-07-27 16:19 ` [PATCH net 4/6] xsk: validate launch-time metadata size Stanislav Fomichev
2026-07-27 16:19 ` [PATCH net 5/6] xsk: move xsk_tx_metadata_request() to xdp_sock_drv.h Stanislav Fomichev
2026-07-27 16:19 ` [PATCH net 6/6] xsk: validate metadata when processing requests Stanislav Fomichev
2026-07-29  9:39 ` [PATCH net 0/6] xsk: harden TX metadata validation against races Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-07-29 16:08   ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=amolBkuwEasuthzu@devvm7509.cco0.facebook.com \
    --to=sdf.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=AutonomousCodeSecurity@microsoft.com \
    --cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
    --cc=alice.kernel@fastmail.im \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=blbllhy@gmail.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dtatulea@nvidia.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
    --cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
    --cc=mbloch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
    --cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
    --cc=witu@nvidia.com \
    --cc=yoong.siang.song@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox